Author: Chessfun
Date: 22:54:08 11/14/05
Go up one level in this thread
On November 14, 2005 at 23:44:34, Günther Simon wrote: >On November 14, 2005 at 19:01:09, Chessfun wrote: > >>On November 14, 2005 at 14:56:25, Günther Simon wrote: >> >>>On November 14, 2005 at 14:31:24, Chessfun wrote: >>> >>>... >>>>>Hello Uri, >>>>>Your game has nothing to do with the topic that I can see. I just searched the >>>>>almost 512,000 games in the Chessbase database.cbh that came with one of the >>>>>programs. There is not one game with the position after 5....Qb6. You can >>>>>argue all you want about some people who have played that position but you >>>>>cannot convince me it's a good move. It may have surprise benefits if you have >>>>>done some home analysis or you are playing some correspondence game where you >>>>>have time to work out all problems or can find games already played from that >>>>>position to give you ideas. Obviously, Deep Sjeng had an advantage here with >>>>>"prior knowledge" of the position backed up by a couple more book moves. >>>>>Congrats to the book maker. >>>>>Jim >>>> >>>>http://www.talkchess.com/forums/1/message.html?461610 >>>> >>>>Sarah. >>> >>>You missed the point. >>>http://www.talkchess.com/forums/1/message.html?461624 >>> >>>I wonder how much redundant info will still arise in this thread? >> >>As long as you count yours as one post, fine with me. >> >>>My post contained already all necessary infos about the setup flaw >>>and about the too short search time for such a position... >>>(independent from Fruit) >>> >>>Guenther >> >>I missed no point. I simply pointed Jim to the fact that engine books were not >>used. >> >>Sarah. > >And what is the meaning of telling him something he knew already? Are you psychic? how would you know what he knew? clearly not by reading his post as if you did you would clearly notice from the post I replied to and his reply to mine that he didn't know that engine books were not used. "Obviously, Deep Sjeng had an advantage here with "prior knowledge" of the position backed up by a couple more book moves. Congrats to the book maker." Do you need a further explaination or is it clear enough now? >What has it to do with the fact that the used a wrong book setup >at all? >? Did I say anything about whether it mattered or not, there you go again trying your psychic ability. If I were you, I'd simply skip it and forget about trying to act like John Edwards. Sarah.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.