Author: Uri Blass
Date: 04:42:29 11/15/05
Go up one level in this thread
On November 15, 2005 at 07:23:28, Bernhard Bauer wrote: >On November 15, 2005 at 07:17:02, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On November 15, 2005 at 06:52:41, Marc Lacrosse wrote: >> >>>1. Fruit 2.2.1 vs Gambitfruit 1.0beta2 >>> blitz 1 min + 1 sec/move >>> no opening book : 50 varied startpositions (Nunn+Noomen) >>> Fruit default parameters >>> GF : default + Futility pruning ON + Delta pruning ON >>> >>> result : Fruit 50.5 - 49.5 GambitFruit >>> >>>2. Shredder9 UCI (default) vs Gambitfruit >>> same conditions as former match >>> >>> partial result after 70 out of 100 games : Shredder 36 - 34 GambitFruit >>> >>>This looks very promising IMHO >>> >>>Marc Lacrosse >> >>I am afaraid that it may mean that if Fabien does not hurry to release an update > >Why are you afraid? It has *nothing* to do with you. > >>of better fruit then less people are not going to buy fruit. > >Feel free to buy as many fruit as you want. > >> >>Commercial Fruit needs to have playing strength advantage relative to >>free alternatives. > >Why? because I think that if it does not have playing strength advantages less people are going to buy it. If Fabien does not release fruit2.3 that is significantly stronger than 2.2 soon then I expect him to have less buyers in the near future. If Fabien decides to release significatly stronger Fruit2.3 soon then it is Fabien's decision if to release Fruit2.3 as a free update or to sell it as a new product. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.