Author: Ryan B.
Date: 05:02:50 11/15/05
Go up one level in this thread
On November 15, 2005 at 07:42:29, Uri Blass wrote: >On November 15, 2005 at 07:23:28, Bernhard Bauer wrote: > >>On November 15, 2005 at 07:17:02, Uri Blass wrote: >> >>>On November 15, 2005 at 06:52:41, Marc Lacrosse wrote: >>> >>>>1. Fruit 2.2.1 vs Gambitfruit 1.0beta2 >>>> blitz 1 min + 1 sec/move >>>> no opening book : 50 varied startpositions (Nunn+Noomen) >>>> Fruit default parameters >>>> GF : default + Futility pruning ON + Delta pruning ON >>>> >>>> result : Fruit 50.5 - 49.5 GambitFruit >>>> >>>>2. Shredder9 UCI (default) vs Gambitfruit >>>> same conditions as former match >>>> >>>> partial result after 70 out of 100 games : Shredder 36 - 34 GambitFruit >>>> >>>>This looks very promising IMHO >>>> >>>>Marc Lacrosse >>> >>>I am afaraid that it may mean that if Fabien does not hurry to release an update >> >>Why are you afraid? It has *nothing* to do with you. >> >>>of better fruit then less people are not going to buy fruit. >> >>Feel free to buy as many fruit as you want. > >> >>> >>>Commercial Fruit needs to have playing strength advantage relative to >>>free alternatives. >> >>Why? > >because I think that if it does not have playing strength advantages less people >are going to buy it. >If Fabien does not release fruit2.3 that is significantly stronger than 2.2 soon >then I expect him to have less buyers in the near future. > >If Fabien decides to release significatly stronger Fruit2.3 soon then >it is Fabien's decision if to release Fruit2.3 as a free update or to sell it as >a new product. > >Uri I hope that Fabian release 2.3 soon. I do not want to step on any toes with my fun. Please cheack your email.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.