Author: Bernhard Bauer
Date: 00:17:53 11/16/05
Go up one level in this thread
On November 15, 2005 at 14:43:50, Eelco de Groot wrote: >On November 15, 2005 at 13:16:27, Marc Lacrosse wrote: > >> >> Gambitfruit 1.0beta2 vs Spike 1.0a >> >> blitz 1 min + 1 sec/move >> no opening book : 50 varied startpositions (Nunn+Noomen) >> >> Spike : default parameters >> GF : default + Futility pruning ON + Delta pruning ON >> >> partial results : GambitFruit 43.5 - 18.5 Spike >> >> >> >> Pretty impressive ! >> >> Marc > >Gambit Fruit seems to gain some "speed" with the futility and delta pruning >turned on again: > >Ferret Gandalf testposition >[D]rr4k1/5p2/3p2p1/3P3p/pnP1P2P/Bn2NR2/5PP1/qB1Q2K1 w - - 1 1 > >Gambit Fruit default Beta 2 over Ferret-Gandalf, e5 in 13 minutes, Nf5 2hours > >00:00:00.0 -0,68 1 3 Bxb4 Rxb4 >00:00:00.0 -0,69 2 391 Bxb4 Rxb4 Qd3 >00:00:00.0 0,66 3 2351 Bxb4 Nd4 Qe1 Nxf3+ gxf3 >00:00:00.0 0,37 4 4394 Bxb4 Nd4 Qe1 Nxf3+ gxf3 a3 >00:00:00.0 -0,19 5 13334 Bxb4 Nd4 Qe1 Qb2 Rxf7 Kxf7 >00:00:00.0 -0,32 6 28079 Bxb4 Nd4 Qe1 Qb2 Nc2 Nxf3+ gxf3 a3 >00:00:00.1 -0,63 7 57569 Bxb4 Nd4 Qe1 Qb2 Nc2 Nxc2 Bxc2 Rxb4 >00:00:00.2 -0,63 8 118219 Bxb4 Nd4 Qe1 Qb2 Nc2 Nxc2 Bxc2 Rxb4 >00:00:00.3 -0,87 9 235631 Bxb4 Nd4 Qe1 Qb2 Nc2 Nxc2 Bxc2 Rxb4 Bd3 >00:00:00.5 -0,97 10 538017 Bxb4 Nd4 Qe1 Qb2 Nc2 Nxc2 Bxc2 Rxb4 Qc3 Qxc3 Rxc3 >00:00:01.0 -1,22 11 1062815 Bxb4 Nd4 Qe1 Qb2 Nc2 Nxc2 Bxc2 Rxb4 Bd3 a3 Qe3 Qa1+ >Bf1 >00:00:02.4 -1,54 12 2377129 Bxb4 Nd4 Qe1 Qb2 Nc2 Nxc2 Bxc2 Rxb4 Rc3 Rc8 Bd3 a3 >00:00:05.0 -1,91 13 5026777 Bxb4 Nd4 Qe1 Qb2 Nc2 Nxf3+ gxf3 Rxb4 Nxb4 Rb8 Nc6 >Qxb1 Qf1 Qxf1+ Kxf1 Rb1+ Ke2 Rb2+ Kd3 a3 >00:00:11.4 -2,13 14 11507575 Bxb4 Nd4 Qe1 Qb2 Nc2 Nxf3+ gxf3 Rxb4 Qxb4 Qxb4 Nxb4 >Rb8 e5 Rxb4 Bd3 Rb3 Be4 dxe5 >00:00:33.8 -1,96 15 32068606 Bxb4 Nd4 Qe1 Qb2 Nc2 Nxf3+ gxf3 Rxb4 Qxb4 Qxb4 Nxb4 >Rb8 Nc2 Rxb1+ Kg2 Rb2 Na3 Kf8 Nb5 Ke7 >00:01:14.7 -2,66 16 69613966 Bxb4 Nd4 Qe1 Qb2 Bxd6 Qxb1 Qxb1 Rxb1+ Kh2 a3 Be5 >Nxf3+ gxf3 a2 c5 a1Q Bxa1 Rbxa1 c6 Rc1 Kg3 Ra2 >00:09:26.0 -2,84 17 501232171 Bxb4 Nd4 Qe1 Qb2 Bxd6 Qxb1 Qxb1 Rxb1+ Kh2 a3 Be5 >Nxf3+ gxf3 Rc1 d6 a2 d7 f6 Bb2 Kf7 Nd5 a1Q Bxa1 Rcxa1 >00:13:01.2 -2,79 17 692736310 e5 dxe5 Rg3 Qxa3 Bxg6 Qc1 Bc2+ Kf8 Bxb3 Qxd1+ Bxd1 >a3 Bb3 a2 Bxa2 Rxa2 Nf5 Rc2 Re3 Rxc4 Rxe5 Nd3 >00:22:00.4 -2,71 18 1166597250 e5 dxe5 Bxb4 Nd4 Qe1 Nxf3+ gxf3 Qb2 Nc2 a3 Bxa3 >Qxb1 Qxb1 Rxb1+ Kg2 Rb3 Be7 Ra2 Nb4 Ra4 Nc6 Rxc4 Nxe5 >00:47:43.4 -2,71 19 2494425208 e5 dxe5 Bxb4 Nd4 Qe1 Nxf3+ gxf3 Qb2 Nc2 a3 Bxa3 >Qxb1 Qxb1 Rxb1+ Kg2 Rb3 Be7 Ra2 Nb4 Ra4 Nc6 Rxc4 Nxe5 >02:09:24.9 -2,62 19 2328152205 Nf5 Ra7 Nh6+ Kg7 Nf5+ Kf8 Nxd6 Qxa3 e5 Qa1 Nb5 >Rxb5 cxb5 Nd4 Rf4 Ne2+ Qxe2 Nxd5 Rc4 Qxb1+ Qf1 Qxf1+ Kxf1 a3 Rc8+ Ke7 Ke2 > >with futility and delta pruning ON e5 in 12 minutes, and considerably less nodes >per ply. Fruit 2.2 did this in 25 minutes I believe, but that is about comparing >apples and oranges, to stay in fruit terms, it's just an impression >I can make a Pro Deo Vulcan version that needs just 6.5 seconds but again that >means almost nothing in itself, if it would drop to 25 minutes though I'd worry >a bit.. > >Gambit Fruit default Beta 2 with futility and delta pruning > >00:00:00.0 -0,68 1 3 Bxb4 Rxb4 >00:00:00.0 -0,69 2 389 Bxb4 Rxb4 Qd3 >00:00:00.0 0,66 3 2085 Bxb4 Nd4 Qe1 Nxf3+ gxf3 >00:00:00.0 0,37 4 3163 Bxb4 Nd4 Qe1 Nxf3+ gxf3 a3 >00:00:00.0 -0,19 5 9344 Bxb4 Nd4 Qe1 Qb2 Rxf7 Kxf7 >00:00:00.0 -0,32 6 18508 Bxb4 Nd4 Qe1 Qb2 Nc2 Nxf3+ gxf3 a3 >00:00:00.1 -0,63 7 34326 Bxb4 Nd4 Qe1 Qb2 Nc2 Nxc2 Bxc2 Rxb4 >00:00:00.1 -0,63 8 69197 Bxb4 Nd4 Qe1 Qb2 Nc2 Nxc2 Bxc2 Rxb4 >00:00:00.2 -0,87 9 131868 Bxb4 Nd4 Qe1 Qb2 Nc2 Nxc2 Bxc2 Rxb4 Bd3 >00:00:00.4 -0,97 10 305864 Bxb4 Nd4 Qe1 Qb2 Nc2 Nxc2 Bxc2 Rxb4 Qc3 Qxc3 Rxc3 >00:00:00.7 -1,22 11 622287 Bxb4 Nd4 Qe1 Qb2 Nc2 Nxc2 Bxc2 Rxb4 Bd3 a3 Qe3 Qa1+ >Bf1 >00:00:01.8 -1,54 12 1491254 Bxb4 Nd4 Qe1 Qb2 Nc2 Nxc2 Bxc2 Rxb4 Rc3 Rc8 Bd3 a3 >00:00:03.6 -1,85 13 3044572 Bxb4 Nd4 Qe1 Qb2 Nc2 Nxf3+ gxf3 Rxb4 Nxb4 Rb8 Nc2 >Qxb1 Qxb1 Rxb1+ Kg2 Rb2 Nd4 >00:00:08.0 -2,13 14 6744456 Bxb4 Nd4 Qe1 Qb2 Nc2 Nxf3+ gxf3 Rxb4 Qxb4 Qxb4 Nxb4 >Rb8 e5 Rxb4 Bd3 Rb3 Be4 dxe5 >00:00:18.6 -1,96 15 15445922 Bxb4 Nd4 Qe1 Qb2 Nc2 Nxf3+ gxf3 Rxb4 Qxb4 Qxb4 Nxb4 >Rb8 Nc2 Rxb1+ Kg2 Rb2 Na3 Kf8 Nb5 Ke7 >00:00:46.1 -2,66 16 38006810 Bxb4 Nd4 Qe1 Qb2 Bxd6 Qxb1 Qxb1 Rxb1+ Kh2 a3 Be5 >Nxf3+ gxf3 a2 c5 a1Q Bxa1 Rbxa1 c6 Rc1 Kg3 Ra2 >00:03:55.3 -2,82 17 186178589 Bxb4 Nd4 Qe1 Qb2 Bxd6 Qxb1 Qxb1 Rxb1+ Kh2 a3 Be5 >Nxf3+ gxf3 Ra5 f4 a2 f5 a1Q Bxa1 Raxa1 fxg6 fxg6 f4 Rb6 >00:11:58.0 -2,61 17 552805493 e5 dxe5 Bxb4 Nd4 Qe1 Nxf3+ gxf3 Qb2 Nc2 a3 Bxa3 >Qxb1 Qxb1 Rxb1+ Kg2 Ra4 Bd6 f6 Ne3 Ra2 >00:20:38.3 -2,71 18 948859856 e5 dxe5 Bxb4 Nd4 Qe1 Nxf3+ gxf3 Qb2 Nc2 a3 Bxa3 >Qxb1 Qxb1 Rxb1+ Kg2 Rb3 Be7 Ra2 Nb4 Ra4 Nc6 Rxc4 Nxe5 >00:34:49.0 -2,71 19 1567616135 e5 dxe5 Bxb4 Nd4 Qe1 Nxf3+ gxf3 Qb2 Nc2 a3 Bxa3 >Qxb1 Qxb1 Rxb1+ Kg2 Rb3 Be7 Ra2 Nb4 Ra4 Nc6 Rxc4 Nxe5 > > Eelco You didn't mentioned your Hardware. For comparison my results. On an AMD XP 1800MHz GambitFruit with lots of parameters on found e5 at depth 16/54 in 15:57 e5 at depth 17/54 in 22:11 Kind regards Bernhard
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.