Author: Bernhard Bauer
Date: 00:39:12 11/16/05
Go up one level in this thread
Are you shure that 1.Kh2 is good? What if black answers 1...Qg5?
I get a score of >3 for black. So white has probably to play 1.Rd1
loosing the exchange.
Kind regards
Bernhard
On November 15, 2005 at 13:43:14, Günther Simon wrote:
>On November 15, 2005 at 08:38:45, Enam wrote:
>
>Hi Enam,
>
>What hardware was used and was it ponder on or off?
>I am asking because I wonder about quite a lot moves
>played in 0.0 seconds despite the increment?
>(after book end and before tablebases of course and no
>forced moves)
>
>>Posting the games of GFruit 1.0 B2 . Thanks
>
>
>An interesting error played with 20 seconds!
>I could verify that Fruit 2.1 also needs quite long to avoid it
>and change to the correct Kh2 (late depth 11)
>[D] 63. Kg1?? {(Kh2) [%eval 0,9] [%emt 0:00:20]}
>
>[D]7r/6k1/1N3bp1/1pPp1q2/1P1P1p2/4nB1P/4Q1P1/4R2K w - - 0 63
>
>CPU0: GenuineIntel x86 Family 6 Model 8 Stepping 1 651 MHz
>GUI: Tablebases mit max. 5 Steinen gefunden! [Cache: 8 MB + intern 1.89 MB]
>Engine: Fruit 2.1 (128 MB)
>von Fabien Letouzey
>Stellung: 0 63
>
>7r/6k1/1N3bp1/1pPp1q2/1P1P1p2/4nB1P/4Q1P1/4R2K w - -
>
>Fruit 2.1
> 1/02 0:00 +0.92 1.Dxb5 Lxd4 (3)
> 1/11 0:00 +1.13 1.Da2 (121)
> 2/16 0:00 -0.26 1.Da2 Txh3+ 2.Kg1 (775)
> 2/16 0:00 +0.27 1.Dd2 Txh3+ 2.gxh3 Dxh3+ 3.Kg1 Dxf3 (980)
> 2/16 0:00 +1.06 1.c6 Lxd4 2.Dxb5 (1.153)
> 2/16 0:00 +1.38 1.Ta1 Lxd4 2.Ta7+ Kf6 3.Dxb5 (1.620)
> 3/16 0:00 +1.38 1.Ta1 Lxd4 2.Ta7+ Kf6 3.Dxb5 (2.354)
> 4/16 0:00 +0.89 1.Ta1 Lxd4 2.Ta7+ Kf6 3.Sd7+ Kg7 4.Dxb5 (5.535)
> 5/23 0:00 +0.90 1.Ta1 Lxd4 2.Ta7+ Kf6 3.Sd7+ Kg5 4.De1 (21.792)
> 6/23 0:00 +0.62 1.Ta1 Lxd4 2.Ta7+ Kf6 3.Kh2 De6 4.Dxb5 (57.699)
> 7/24 0:00 +0.42 1.Ta1 Lxd4 2.Ta7+ Kf6 3.Kh2 Dg5 4.Sd7+ Kf7 5.Se5+ Ke6
>(156.505)
> 8/28 0:02 -1.60 1.Ta1 Lxd4 2.Ta7+ Kf6 3.Df2 Db1+ 4.Dg1 Dxg1+ 5.Kxg1 Sc4+
>6.Kf1 Sxb6 7.cxb6 Lxb6 8.Ta2 (471.043) 186
> 8/28 0:04 -0.45 1.Dd2 Txh3+ 2.Kg1 Th4 3.Dc3 Ld8 4.Kf2 Lxb6 5.cxb6 Th2
>6.Dc7+ Kg8 (846.623) 200
> 8/28 0:05 0.00 1.Kg1 Lxd4 2.Kh2 Dg5 3.Kh1 Df5 4.Kh2 (1.080.254) 201
> 9/28 0:07 0.00 1.Kg1 Lxd4 2.Kh2 Dg5 3.Kh1 Df5 4.Kh2 (1.484.207) 202
> 10/32 0:12 0.00 1.Kg1 Lxd4 2.Kh2 Dg5 3.Kh1 Df5 4.Kh2 (2.498.062) 205
> 11/42 0:34 -1.86 1.Kg1 Lxd4 2.Dd2 Df6 3.Dd3 Sc2+ 4.Kf1 Sxe1 5.Kxe1 Lc3+
>6.Kf1 De5 7.De2 Dxe2+ 8.Kxe2 Te8+ 9.Kd3 Lxb4 10.Sxd5 Lxc5 11.Sxf4 (6.734.524)
>194
> 11/42 0:39 -1.02 1.Dd2 Txh3+ 2.gxh3 Dxh3+ 3.Kg1 Dg3+ 4.Lg2 Sxg2 5.Te7+ Lxe7
>6.Dxg2 De1+ 7.Kh2 Lh4 8.Dxd5 Df2+ 9.Dg2 Dxd4 10.Db7+ Kh6 (7.911.689) 199
> 11/42 0:54 0.00 1.Kh2 Dg5 2.Kh1 Df5 (11.013.736) 203
>
>This means it would still need around 20 sec on a P4 2.2 Ghz machine
>
>Guenther
>
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.