Author: Dagh Nielsen
Date: 05:52:36 11/16/05
Go up one level in this thread
I think the logic that you can't deduce anything from experiments on bad hardware or in short time controls is flawed due to a fundamental reason: The position in question could always be a few plies down in a search from another position. Then the program would not have all resources available for evaluating this particular line. By extension, if a program performs suboptimally at short time controls or on slow hardware, it is very likely to perfom just as suboptimal at longer time control and on faster hardware. Regards, Dagh Nielsen On November 16, 2005 at 07:33:55, Ernst Walet wrote: >You're running on ancient hardware. Futhermore your TB hits are way to low. is >your setup right? > >Is the following convincing enough? > >Deep Shredder 9.02 x64 by Stefan Meyer-Kahlen, www.shredderchess.com >CPU0: AuthenticAMD AMD64 Family 15 Model 43 Stepping 1 2203 MHz >CPU1: AuthenticAMD AMD64 Family 15 Model 43 Stepping 1 2203 MHz >GUI: Tablebases with 5 pieces found! [Cache: 16 MB + internal 13.67 MB] >Engine: Deep Shredder 9 x64 (1000 MB) >by Stefan Meyer-Kahlen > 19/38 0:01 -0.85++ 1...Kf6 2.Kf4 (2.359.939) 1411 TB:8.037 > 19/38 0:01 -0.85 1...Kf6 2.Kf4 a5 3.f3 Ke6 4.Kg5 Ke5 5.f4+ Kd4 6.Kxf5 Kxc4 >(2.494.108) 1376 TB:8.597 > 20/38 0:02 -0.76 1...Kf6 2.Kf4 a5 3.f3 Ke6 4.Kg5 Ke5 5.f4+ Kd4 6.Kxf5 Kxc4 >7.Ke4 Kc5 8.f5 h5 9.f6 Kd6 (3.544.392) 1383 TB:10.882 > 21/41 0:04 -0.77 1...Kf6 2.Kf4 Ke6 3.a5 Kd6 4.bxa6 bxa6 5.Kxf5 Kc5 6.f4 Kxc4 >7.Kf6 Kd4 8.Ke6 h5 9.f5 h4 10.f6 h3 11.f7 h2 12.f8Q h1Q 13.Qd6+ Ke4 (5.974.639) >1405 TB:19.755 > 22/43 0:05 -1.02-- 1...Kf6 2.Kf4 (7.723.622) 1445 TB:22.035 > 22/43 0:05 -1.52-- 1...Kf6 2.Kf4 (8.806.894) 1479 TB:22.450 > 22/43 0:13 -1.52 1...Kf6 2.Kf4 a5 (19.869.616) 1428 TB:40.550 > 23/41 0:16 -1.77-- 1...Kf6 2.Kf4 (24.178.482) 1440 TB:48.372 > 23/41 0:17 -2.27-- 1...Kf6 2.Kf4 (25.074.667) 1457 TB:48.943 > 23/44 0:40 -8.60 1...Kf6 2.c5 axb5 3.c6 bxc6 4.a5 b4 5.Ke2 b3 6.Kd2 c5 7.a6 >c4 8.Kc3 (62.786.080) 1542 TB:64.488 > 24/43 0:51 -8.84 1...Kf6 2.c5 axb5 3.c6 bxc6 4.a5 b4 5.Ke2 b3 6.Kd2 h5 7.a6 >h4 (73.114.721) 1425 TB:100.237 > 25/45 1:07 -9.08 1...Kf6 2.c5 axb5 3.c6 bxc6 4.a5 b4 5.Ke2 b3 6.Kd2 h5 7.a6 >c5 8.a7 c4 9.Kc3 h4 10.a8Q Kg6 11.Qg2+ Kh6 12.f4 (89.236.543) 1318 TB:158.137 > 26/49 1:28 -9.19 1...Kf6 2.c5 axb5 3.c6 bxc6 4.a5 b4 5.Ke2 b3 6.Kd2 f4 7.a6 >b2 8.Kc2 b1Q+ (113.629.171) 1288 TB:225.436 >best move: Kg5-f6 time: 1:33.438 min n/s: 1.311.159 CPU 156.0% n/s(1CPU): >840.486 nodes: 122.470.149 TB: 230.098 > >Ernst.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.