Author: Uri Blass
Date: 07:55:31 11/16/05
Go up one level in this thread
On November 16, 2005 at 10:30:20, Mike Hood wrote: >On November 16, 2005 at 07:52:37, Thomas Logan wrote: > >>http://www.chessbase.com/newsdetail.asp?newsid=2742 >> >>Tom > >Blah blah blah. > >This declaration is all about politics and has nothing to do with chess. > >Topalov is making more enemies than friends by siding with FIDE in this matter. I am not sure about it. I like his decision and I am not sure what is the opinion of the majority. >Maybe he is stronger than Kramnik, based on his recent performance, maybe not. >But many people regard Kramnik as the true classical chess champion, so Topalov >should swallow his pride and agree to a title match to unify the titles. I do not regard kramnik as the true classical chess champion and I remember that Kramnik was invited to the fide championship and rejected the invitation. There is more than one reason not to consider kramnik as the champion. 1)Kramnik lost a match against shirov and I know no world champion that got the right to play for the world championship after losing a match so kramnik should not play for the title in the first place. 2)Kramnik is not the best player based on rating. Usually I am not going to consider 2 as a serious reason but in this case poor results were used against Shirov when sponsors prefered Kramnik to play against kasparov so it is only fair if they are used now against kramnik. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.