Author: David H. McClain
Date: 13:43:24 11/16/05
Go up one level in this thread
On November 16, 2005 at 16:28:59, Tomas Casanovas Martinez wrote: >On November 16, 2005 at 16:05:37, Dann Corbit wrote: > >>On November 16, 2005 at 15:38:16, Tomas Casanovas Martinez wrote: >> >>>After almost three weeks working 24 hours per day, my computer is about to be >>>burnt!. ;-D >>> >>> >>>Tourney: >>> >>>Fritz 9 - own book >>>Fruit 2.2.1 - own book >>>Deep Shredder 9.1 UCI - Shredder 8 book >>> >>>No tablebases. >>> >>>No learning. >>> >>>Ponder off. >>> >>>Junior 9 GUI >>> >>>40/40 + 40/40 + 40 >>> >>>Pentium IV, 3,00 Mhz. 2 CPUS. >>> >>>Previous posts: >>> >>>"" Standings after 39 out of 150 games: >>> >>> 1 2 3 >>>Fruit 2.2.1 ......... 9,5-3,5 9,0-4,0 18,5/26 >>>Fritz 9 3,5-9,5 ....... 7,5-5,5 11,0/26 >>>Deep Shredder 9,1 4,0-9,0 5,5-7,5 ....... 9,5/26 >>> >>>Standings after 72 out of 150 games: >>> >>> 1 2 3 >>>Fruit 2.2.1 ....... 12,5-11,5 14,0-10,0 26,5/48 >>>Deep Shredder 9.1 11,5-12,5 ....... 11,5-11,5 23,0/48 >>>Fritz 9 10,0-14,0 12,5-11,5 ....... 22,5/48 >>> >>> >>>Standings after 90 out of 150 games: >>> >>> 1 2 3 >>>Fruit 2.2.1 ......... 17,0-13,0 16,5-13,5 33,5/60 >>>Fritz 9 13,0-17,0 ....... 16,5-13,5 29,5/60 >>>Deep Shredder 9.1 13,5-16,5 13,5-16,5 ....... 27,0/60 >>> >>> >>> >>>Standings after 111 out of 150 games: >>> >>>Fruit 2.2.1 ......... 20,0-17,0 21,0-16,0 41,0/74 >>>Fritz 9 17,0-20,0 ....... 21,5-15,5 38,5/74 >>>Deep Shredder 9.1 16,0-21,0 15,5-21,5 ....... 31,5/74"" >>> >>>................................................................................. >>> >>> >>>AND THE LATEST NEWS: >>> >>>Standings after 132 out of 150 games: >>> >>>Fruit 2.2.1 ......... 24,5-19,5 24,5-19,5 49,0/88 >>>Fritz 9 19,5-24,5 ....... 25,0-19,0 44,5/88 >>>Deep Shredder 9.1 19,5-24,5 19,0-25,0 ....... 38,5/88 >>> >>>Fruit keeps showing its impressive solvency and strength. It is able to get the >>>same comfortable score against its two very strong opponents. With only 12 games >>>to finish the tournament -and give a deserved rest to my computer- it would be a >>>great surprise for me if the final standings are different from the current >>>ones: >>> >>>1.- Fruit 2.2.1 >>>2.- Fritz 9 and >>>3.- Deep Shredder 9.1 UCI >>> >>>But it is better not to anticipate anything yet... >> >>Shredder has taken quite a pasting since the 48 game mark (only 15.5 points in >>the last 40 games). >>Scoring pace for 23/48 is 48% >>15.5/40=39%, so about a ten percent drop-off. > > >Yes, Dann. You are right. I have checked its speed and it runs roughly at the >same speed than at the starting of this tournament. Learning is off. I am also >surprised by its poor performance in the last games. This is the first time >where Deep Shredder 9.1 UCI, in my opinion a great program, does not win one of >my tests -when it participates, obviously- . >>Barcelona Tomas, Shredder has a long reputation of "coming from behind." We have seen it many times in other tournaments posted here. I don't think we will see that here. The difference preventing that from happening again seems to be the emergence of Fruit. Very impressive. Thank you for a nice Tournament. DHM
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.