Author: Thomas Logan
Date: 15:27:12 11/16/05
Go up one level in this thread
On November 16, 2005 at 14:44:52, Uri Blass wrote: >On November 16, 2005 at 14:38:53, Thomas Logan wrote: > >>On November 16, 2005 at 10:30:20, Mike Hood wrote: >> >>>On November 16, 2005 at 07:52:37, Thomas Logan wrote: >>> >>>>http://www.chessbase.com/newsdetail.asp?newsid=2742 >>>> >>>>Tom >>> >>>Blah blah blah. >>> >>>This declaration is all about politics and has nothing to do with chess. >>> >>>Topalov is making more enemies than friends by siding with FIDE in this matter. >>>Maybe he is stronger than Kramnik, based on his recent performance, maybe not. >>>But many people regard Kramnik as the true classical chess champion, so Topalov >>>should swallow his pride and agree to a title match to unify the titles. >>> >>>In boxing it happens all the time ;) >> >>A matter of curiousity who has Kramnik defended his "title" against in the last >>12 years >> >>In boxing one may lose ones title for not meeting the number one ranked >>contender >> >>Tom >> >>Tom > >kramnik drew a match against peter leko in order to defend his "title". > >Uri Hi Uri Yes my point Kramnik in 12 years played but 1 match which he did not win and was lucky to avoid losing These are not the marks of champion IMO Tom
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.