Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Chess & The Art of Attack vs. Logic of Opinion

Author: Stephen A. Boak

Date: 21:30:18 11/16/05

Go up one level in this thread


On November 16, 2005 at 10:55:31, Uri Blass wrote:

>
>2)Kramnik is not the best player based on rating.
>
>Usually I am not going to consider 2 as a serious reason but in this case
>poor results were used against Shirov when sponsors prefered Kramnik
>to play against kasparov so it is only fair if they are used now against
>kramnik.
>
>Uri

Beautiful, Uri!
Impeccable logic, as usual.   ;)

Do not forget that young people often visit this bulletin board.  Sometimes they
are overly sensitive to logical arguments and may feel pressured to agree, even
if they do not understand.

Please consider the following statements, then answer the below Test Question:

1. Two wrongs do not make a right.
   A. This is *not* like mathematics:  -1 * -1 = +1

2. If you mix a weak argument with a strong argument, you diminish the value of
your opinion, and perhaps also the value of the strong argument.
   A. The proponent of a strong argument diminishes himself by scraping the
bottom of the barrel to come up with the additional (weak) argument.

3. Sponsors were wrong in their treatment of Shirov; therefore, I, Uri, may
treat Kramnik wrong, and my treatment of Kramnik is therefore fair.
   A. General Rule--if A mistreats B to the benefit of D, then I, C, may
mistreat D, because it is fair.

TEST:

Which of the above statements is TRUE?

NOTE--Do not reply using one or more *negatives* ['no', 'not', and similar] or
zero credit will be given.  :)

A. 1 only
B. 2 only
C. 1 & 2 only
D. 3 only
E. All of the above
F. None of the above
G. Other.  Please describe in full (Remember, *no* negatives, else zero credit)
_________________________________________

H. There are many other illogical arguments in favor of being unfair.  This is
only one of them.  Therefore, please do not attempt to critique my opinion
solely through the use of logic, or by defeating this singular opinion.  I have
more arguments available, believe me, and if necessary, I will freely draw upon
any or all of them.

I. Do not bother me, I am only a mathematician doing the best I can.  I did not
major in logic, or it was so long ago I have forgotten the basics.

Your Answer (enter appropriate capital letter, A - I): ______.

--Steve :)




This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.