Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Can any program avoid this move? (Diagram)

Author: Uri Blass

Date: 00:54:04 11/17/05

Go up one level in this thread


On November 17, 2005 at 03:51:02, Ryan B. wrote:

>On November 17, 2005 at 03:15:02, Terry McCracken wrote:
>
>>On November 16, 2005 at 17:55:29, Joachim Rang wrote:
>>
>>>On November 16, 2005 at 17:42:56, John Merlino wrote:
>>>
>>>>On November 16, 2005 at 17:35:29, Kurt Utzinger wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On November 16, 2005 at 17:04:23, Joachim Rang wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>In my tuning for Fruit I stumbled over the following game when a very promising
>>>>>>looking sacrifice does seem to loose the game. After that white can compromise
>>>>>>blacks king side completely but seems unable to proceed the attack and loose
>>>>>>afterwards. I have analyzed this and it does indeed seem the game continuation
>>>>>>is rather forced and leads to a inferior position of white:
>>>>>>
>>>>>[D]rqrb2k1/5pp1/2b2P1p/p2n1n1P/1p2N3/1N2BB2/PPP2Q2/1K1R3R w - - 0 27 am Bxh6?!
>>>>
>>>>That's the way it looks to me, but the program will have to see at least 24
>>>>plies ahead (pretty tough with that much wood on the board) to see the problem.
>>>>
>>>>It also looks like 34.c4 Ne3 35.Rd5 Nxd5 36.Nxf7+ Rxf7 37.Bxd5 Re7 38.Rf1 Rxh7
>>>>39.Rf2 might be a slight improvement, but I don't have the time to really check
>>>>it out.
>>>>
>>>>jm
>>>
>>>Yes it is incredible deep. :-)
>>>
>>>34.c4 is probably a better defense for white but in your line white is the
>>>exchange down and I don't see enough compensation for that for white. The 34th
>>>move is the first move where there are really alternatives for white perhaps
>>>34.c3 as well but white is already worse on move 34 I think.
>>>
>>>Joacchim
>>
>>Why not sac the Bishop? It looks strong!
>>
>>Terry
>
>If you follow the simple rules on when to do a minor sac for a king attack this
>is not the time.  Still the move does look ok at first but ends up being a
>failed attack if you work it out.
>
>Ryan

In the game it failed but as pointed by another poster the mistake is probably
29.h6 and 29.fxg7 is better

[D]rqrb2k1/5pp1/2b2P2/p2n1n1P/1p2N3/1N3B2/PPP3Q1/1K1R3R w - - 0 29

Uri



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.