Author: Ryan B.
Date: 01:39:15 11/17/05
Go up one level in this thread
On November 17, 2005 at 03:54:04, Uri Blass wrote: >On November 17, 2005 at 03:51:02, Ryan B. wrote: > >>On November 17, 2005 at 03:15:02, Terry McCracken wrote: >> >>>On November 16, 2005 at 17:55:29, Joachim Rang wrote: >>> >>>>On November 16, 2005 at 17:42:56, John Merlino wrote: >>>> >>>>>On November 16, 2005 at 17:35:29, Kurt Utzinger wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On November 16, 2005 at 17:04:23, Joachim Rang wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>Hi, >>>>>>> >>>>>>>In my tuning for Fruit I stumbled over the following game when a very promising >>>>>>>looking sacrifice does seem to loose the game. After that white can compromise >>>>>>>blacks king side completely but seems unable to proceed the attack and loose >>>>>>>afterwards. I have analyzed this and it does indeed seem the game continuation >>>>>>>is rather forced and leads to a inferior position of white: >>>>>>> >>>>>>[D]rqrb2k1/5pp1/2b2P1p/p2n1n1P/1p2N3/1N2BB2/PPP2Q2/1K1R3R w - - 0 27 am Bxh6?! >>>>> >>>>>That's the way it looks to me, but the program will have to see at least 24 >>>>>plies ahead (pretty tough with that much wood on the board) to see the problem. >>>>> >>>>>It also looks like 34.c4 Ne3 35.Rd5 Nxd5 36.Nxf7+ Rxf7 37.Bxd5 Re7 38.Rf1 Rxh7 >>>>>39.Rf2 might be a slight improvement, but I don't have the time to really check >>>>>it out. >>>>> >>>>>jm >>>> >>>>Yes it is incredible deep. :-) >>>> >>>>34.c4 is probably a better defense for white but in your line white is the >>>>exchange down and I don't see enough compensation for that for white. The 34th >>>>move is the first move where there are really alternatives for white perhaps >>>>34.c3 as well but white is already worse on move 34 I think. >>>> >>>>Joacchim >>> >>>Why not sac the Bishop? It looks strong! >>> >>>Terry >> >>If you follow the simple rules on when to do a minor sac for a king attack this >>is not the time. Still the move does look ok at first but ends up being a >>failed attack if you work it out. >> >>Ryan > >In the game it failed but as pointed by another poster the mistake is probably >29.h6 and 29.fxg7 is better > >[D]rqrb2k1/5pp1/2b2P2/p2n1n1P/1p2N3/1N3B2/PPP3Q1/1K1R3R w - - 0 29 > >Uri I took a shortcut and started analyzing at 34 and now look like a fool I guess. My first reaction to 26 Bxh6 looks to be right in that it leads to a draw. 29. fxg7 Qf4 30. h6 Nxh6 31. Qh3 Ne3 32. Rdg1 Bxe4 33. Bxe4 Bg5 34. Bxa8 Rxa8 35. Qh5 f6 36. Qg6 a4 37. Nc5 After the forced queen trade this should be a draw. Ryan
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.