Author: Terry McCracken
Date: 02:12:06 11/17/05
Go up one level in this thread
On November 17, 2005 at 04:48:30, Ryan B. wrote: >On November 17, 2005 at 04:10:03, ERIQ wrote: > >>On November 17, 2005 at 02:06:32, Derek Paquette wrote: >> >>>On November 17, 2005 at 02:00:46, Enam wrote: >>> >>>>Dear friends, >>>>I have received mail from chessbase usa , they says HIARCS 10 will available >>>>from December 5th 2005. >>>>So, I think Fruit has new competetor soon. Worrried Fruit Users ? >>>>Regurds >>>> >>>>Enam. >>> >>> >>>i'm curious to see if the hiarcs team decides to advertise and market their >>>program with a nice supergrandmaster ass kicking, >> >>I for one am getting tired of the beatings. > >I disagree, Evan an IM level chess player has a small chance in a game against >top commercial programs on PC hardware. If the human can get into a known >position from a past game in history late in the game he can become almost >unbeatable. > >Ryan Yes I've seen non titled players even get winning postions at ICC at Game 15 only to lose on time. No anti-computer chess was used by these people. They're just very good players. If we removed the time losses there would be many wins, proving machines are very fast but not invincible. I don't understand why people fail to realize this? Of course you do need to play a lot of computer chess. If I can beat programs on a good day then GM's should find this task less difficult for them. Terry PS I'd love to see Hydra go down in flames by a very talented computer chess player. But I'm afraid this isn't going to happen, as Hydra is shielded from such educated computer chess players.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.