Author: Uri Blass
Date: 06:06:33 11/17/05
Go up one level in this thread
On November 17, 2005 at 08:38:27, Michael Neish wrote: >On November 17, 2005 at 08:14:32, Uri Blass wrote: > >>I read that it is using hash in a different way. >> >>I think that it also has better evaluation than other free source code programs >>and of course history pruning gives it a significant advantage. >> > >Thanks. Now my time away from CCC is starting to show. I have no idea what >history pruning is. Could you give me a link to an explanation (haven't been >able to find one doing a quick WWW search), or would you mind explaining it >briefly? Thanks again for your time. > >I like the idea of commenting programs. Although personally I doubt I could >help, I think people might prefer just adding comments withing the files >containing the source code, rather than creating separate text files. There >probably isn't much difference, but the latter may be perceived as more work, >and put off some people. Just my opinion. > >Regards, > >Mike. You can read the following link http://wbforum.volker-pittlik.name/viewtopic.php?t=3795 The reason that I suggested to do it in different files is that some people claimed that it is harder to read a program when there are many comments inside of it. Tord said in the link that I gave "Verbose and overcommented code (e.g. Crafty) is tedious to read. Like so much else, this is of course largely a matter of taste" Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.