Author: Vikrant Malvankar
Date: 21:20:46 11/17/05
Go up one level in this thread
Uri If thats the case does'nt he deserve part of money they are earning. On November 17, 2005 at 16:39:31, Uri Blass wrote: >On November 17, 2005 at 16:19:13, Marc Lacrosse wrote: > >>As I consider that Fabien Letouzey and Joachim Rang did not act with minimally >>correct behaviour toward myself on their way for going commercial with Fruit, I >>asked them to be removed from the list of their team members on >>www.fruitchess.com. >> >>Although they promised to do it, nothing has been done for weeks and I am still >>being presented as their book-cooker on fruitchess.com although Fruit has >>already been playing inbetween in a public competition with someone else's book. >> >>So I decided to let you know that I just sent the following mail to them (see at >>the end of this post) >> >>Marc Lacrosse >> >>COPY OF MY MAIL: >> >>Dear Fabien, Dear Joachim, >> >>In his 12.11.2005 mail Joachim told me that he would mention on fruitchess.com >>that i am not Fruit's bookcooker anymore. >>As this is not yet done today 17.11.2005 I send this last mail to you and begin >>to switch to other kinds of actions. >> >>Considering how you deal with those who helped you graciously with hours and >>days (or weeks!) of work before you decided to try to get some money from these >>largely collective efforts, I think that the computer chess community should be >>aware of your way of acting. >> >>Clearly as long as I could be of some help, I was scarcely given some minimal >>knowledge of what was going on. But at the same time you were glad to get my bug >>reports, parameters tunings and opening preparations while you were already busy >>attributing my job in the team to someone else. >> >>That's your way of going on. I am quite sure that it won't be too successful in >>the long run. I already have records of several talented people who once helped >>you and clearly decided to go away or already started to help other concurrent >>initiatives. >> >>Several weeks have passed since i first asked you to be removed from the >>description of your team's members on fruitchess.com. You clearly decided not to >>do anything as other components of your site were updated inbetween. Be it your >>laziness or anything else doesn't matter anymore : time has come to let all this >>be known on chess computing forums. >> >>In case this should not be sufficient, I keep open all options of proceeding >>with legal action against your abusive use of my name and work on your site. >> >>Pr.Dr. Marc Lacrosse > >I do not think that you have the right to take legal action against them. >It is clear that they do not write lies in their site and you were a member in >the fruit team. > >The title is >Team / History >It means that if in the history you were a member of the fruit team they have >the right to mention you. > >This is written in the fruit site: > >"Marc Lacrosse is the bookbuilder of Fruit. He built the book for the WCCC'05 in >Reykjavik." > >Is there something that is not correct here? > >You built the book for the WCCC'05 in Reykjavik is correct. >I understand that the book of the commercial fruit is also by you and I think >that they have the right to mention it even if you do not like it. > >The book of fruit from some tournament from novemeber is by someone else but >that tournament is not mentioned in the fruit site. > > >Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.