Author: Uri Blass
Date: 14:22:39 11/18/05
Go up one level in this thread
On November 18, 2005 at 15:27:26, Eduard Nemeth wrote:
>Thueringen 2005: Zappa beat Fruit 2.2.1 again!
>
>Ranking after 6 Round of 9 (timecontrol is 2,5h/game):
>
>1. Toga 4.0
>2. Zappa 4.0
>3. Gandalf 4.0
>4. Fritz 4.0
>5. Fruit 3.5
>6. Schredder 3.5
>7. Chess Tiger 3.5
>8. Junior 3.5
>9. Deep Sjeng 2.5
>10. Ktulu 2.5
>11. Chess Master 2.5
>12. Spike 2.5
>13. Hiarcs 2.5
>14. Hans 2.0
>15. Pro Deo 2.0
>16. Loop List 1.5
>
>
>Games Download here:
>
>http://www.harald-faber.de/
>
>In Round 4, Zappa won against Fruit again (now 3x in Serie):
>
>[Event "14. Thüringer Computerturnier"]
>[Site "Triebes"]
>[Date "2005.11.17"]
>[Round "4"]
>[White "Fruit 2.2.1, AMD 3400+."]
>[Black "Zappa 2.1b, Dual Opteron 2x2,4"]
>[Result "0-1"]
>[ECO "E12"]
>[Annotator "K. Bauermeister"]
>[PlyCount "148"]
>[EventDate "2005.11.??"]
>[EventType "swiss"]
>[EventRounds "9"]
>[EventCountry "GER"]
>[TimeControl "9000"]
>
>{1024MB, ZAPPA.ctg, BAUER-9YKFYVNLA} 1. c4 {0} e6 {0} 2. d4 {10} Nf6 {0} 3. Nf3
>{8} b6 {0} 4. a3 {7} Bb7 {0} 5. Nc3 {5} d5 {0} 6. Bg5 {6} Be7 {0} 7. Qa4+ {6}
>c6 {0} 8. Bxf6 {6} Bxf6 {0} 9. cxd5 {5} exd5 {0} 10. g3 {6} O-O {0} 11. Bg2 {8}
>c5 {0} 12. Rd1 {7} Qe7 {0} 13. O-O {8} Rd8 {0} 14. e3 {8} Na6 {0} 15. Rd2 {7}
>Nc7 {0} 16. Rfd1 {6} Rd6 {0} 17. dxc5 {71} bxc5 {0} 18. Nh4 {268} g6 {
>0.18/15 569} 19. Bxd5 {291} Bxd5 {0.27/18 598} 20. Nxd5 {239} Nxd5 {0.27/18 174
>} 21. Rxd5 {57} Rxd5 {0.14/18 346} 22. Rxd5 {61} Bxb2 {0.43/17 325} 23. Qc6 {
>(Sf3) 334} Rd8 {0.37/17 368} 24. Qxc5 {8} Qxc5 {0.15/19 293} 25. Rxc5 {7} Rd1+
>{0.09/18 243} 26. Kg2 {11} Ra1 {0.09/18 229} 27. Rb5 {194} Bxa3 {0.09/18 37}
>28. Nf3 {328} Be7 {0.08/17 0} 29. Ne5 {(Sd4) 327} Bf6 {0.08/17 230} 30. Nc6 {8}
>Kg7 {0.12/17 213} 31. Kf3 {410} a6 {0.04/18 135} 32. Rc5 {(Tb7) 91} Ra3 {
>0.00/19 207} 33. Rd5 {67} Ra2 {0.00/18 131} 34. Nb4 {(Tc5) 247} Ra1 {
>0.00/17 129} 35. Rd6 {(Sc6) 12} a5 {-0.20/18 126} 36. Nd5 {(Sc2) 183} Be5 {
>-0.20/18 122} 37. Rb6 {334} Rd1 {-0.03/18 0} 38. Ke4 {223} Ba1 {-0.03/17 0} 39.
>Nf4 {169} Rd2 {-0.03/17 0} 40. Ra6 {(Kf3) 178} Rxf2 {-0.24/18 119} 41. Rxa5 {
>212} Bc3 {-0.23/18 0} 42. Rc5 {(Ta3) 201} Be1 {-0.20/17 116} 43. Nd3 {163} f5+
>{-0.23/18 0} 44. Kd4 {235} Re2 {-0.29/18 0} 45. Nxe1 {217} Rxe1 {-0.30/20 0}
>46. Kd3 {105} Kh6 {-0.27/19 8} 47. Rc4 {(Tc2) 182} Rh1 {-0.26/20 113} 48. Rc2 {
>(Th4+) 159} Kg5 {-0.13/19 110} 49. e4 {(Tf2) 78} f4 {-0.41/19 107} 50. gxf4+ {
>47} Kxf4 {-0.39/19 57} 51. Rf2+ {129} Ke5 {-0.39/20 0} 52. Ra2 {(Ke3) 221} Rb1
>{-0.44/19 103} 53. Ra5+ {(Ke3) 71} Kf4 {-0.47/17 100} 54. Ra7 {18} h5 {
>-0.43/19 79} 55. Rf7+ {(Ta6) 161} Ke5 {-0.44/17 21} 56. Re7+ {161} Kf6 {
>-0.42/19 0} 57. Rc7 {133} h4 {-0.43/19 0} 58. Ke3 {59} Rb2 {-0.40/20 36} 59. h3
>{109} Rg2 {-0.03/20 0} 60. Kd4 {52} Kg5 {0.00/21 42} 61. e5 {207} Rg3 {
>0.00/23 0} 62. Rf7 {(Th7) 174} Rxh3 {0.00/21 93} 63. e6 {7} Rh1 {0.00/20 84}
>64. Ke5 {(Kd5) 52} h3 {0.00/19 124} 65. e7 $4 {
>(Th7) Weiß hat die TableBases nicht aktiviert 118} (65. Rh7 h2 66. e7 Re1+)
>65... Re1+ {-9.15/18 85} 66. Kd6 {(Kd4) 79} h2 {-11.16/16 83} 67. Rh7 {
>(Tf1) 111} Kf6 {-#49/20 80} 68. Rxh2 {12} Rd1+ {-#48/24 66} 69. Kc5 {49} Kxe7 {
>-#47/23 27} 70. Re2+ {(Kc4) 48} Kf6 {-#41/1 0} 71. Rf2+ {(Te4) 235} Kg7 {
>-#40/1 0} 72. Rf4 {6} g5 {-#33/1 0} 73. Rd4 {93} Rxd4 {-#23/1 0} 74. Kxd4 {41}
>Kg6 {-#22/1 0} 0-1
>
>Edu.
I think that this is not fair
all the advantage of fruit2.2.1 relative to fruit2.2 is the ability to use
tablebases so why fruit did not use the KRP vs KR tablebases
65.e7 is not played by my Fruit2.2.1 with the relevant tablebases
70.Re2+ is a clear proof that fruit did not use the krp vs kr tablebases because
it could play the tablebase move(70.Kc4) with them that is losing in less moves
relative to 70.Re2+.
Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.