Author: J.Dufek
Date: 00:55:06 11/19/05
Go up one level in this thread
On November 19, 2005 at 03:22:41, Uri Blass wrote: >On November 19, 2005 at 02:37:21, J.Dufek wrote: > >>All computers like this type of sicilian for black. > There is no exception. > >This is wrong >JNoomen: >"Fruit now HAS to play the move 19.Kb1! It is the only good >move and the move that will preserve White's clear lead. Diep expected that move >and showed a clear white plus." Really? What chess program (except Diep, and i have doubts here) give you positive score for white after 19.Kb1? > >>Position is about finding right plan, not for evalution root position. White is >>probably little better after 19...a3 20.b3, because black have problem with his >>counterplay on queenside. White soon or later after h2-h4 maybe prepare c2-c3 >>with open c-file, exchange major pieces here and won endgame, because weak a3 >>pawn .... :-) > >You may be correct but computers should be able to find things by a deep search > >It is possible that I did not give fruit enough time >When I analyze for more time scores start to go down but still positive for >black. > >I cannot give fruit hours to analyze and I wonder if it can see positive score >for white after enough time. > >consiudering the fact that it was claimed that diep did mistakes I expect to see >more than minimal advantage for white in case that the claim is correct and I >even do not see equality by evaluation. > >18: Fruit - Diep, DCCC 25th rapid 90 min 2005 >r4rk1/2qnbppp/3p4/3Pp1P1/pp2N3/3QBP2/PPP4P/1K1R2R1 b - - 0 1 > >Analysis by Fruit 2.2.1: > >19...a3 20.b3 Rfc8 21.h4 Ra5 22.Rg2 Kh8 23.c4 bxc3 24.Rc2 Qb7 25.Ka1 f5 26.Nxc3 >f4 27.Bf2 Nc5 28.Qc4 Qd7 29.Bxc5 Raxc5 > ³ (-0.27) Depth: 19/54 00:12:38 482646kN >19...a3 20.b3 Rfc8 21.h4 Ra5 22.Rg2 Kh8 23.c4 bxc3 24.Rc2 Qb7 25.Ka1 Kg8 26.Nxc3 >Nc5 27.Qf5 g6 28.Qh3 Kg7 29.Ne4 > = (-0.20) Depth: 20/55 00:25:51 1016803kN > >(, 19.11.2005)
This page took 2.54 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.