Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Fruit - Diep : lively comment of bad or missing King safety of Fruit

Author: Marc Lacrosse

Date: 01:06:54 11/19/05

Go up one level in this thread


On November 19, 2005 at 03:58:09, Andre van Ark wrote:

>Hi Marc,
>
>Today there are not many professional engines that will snatch the pawn on b3.
>The loss is imho not an example of bad book cooking, but an example of bad or
>even missing King safety of Fruit.
>
>Greetings,
>André


I do not agree.

If Fruit's missing king safety is involved, than the role of the book-cooker is
precisely to avoid going into positions where this known weakness is
significant.
Moreover there had been explicit identifification of this kind of problems in
opposite-castling sicilian positions by several Fruit's team members and Jeroen
was aware of it.

Marc



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.