Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Centipawn Evaluations....

Author: chandler yergin

Date: 02:00:23 11/19/05

Go up one level in this thread


On November 19, 2005 at 03:52:34, Eelco de Groot wrote:

>On November 19, 2005 at 03:22:09, chandler yergin wrote:
>
>>Oh and I see you are anonymous. No Profile.
>>What are your Qualifications to judge or comment?
>
>Hello Chandler, sorry if I have offended you. I could not really believe you
>were being 100% serious in your first post (were you?), and I thought I'd take
>some of the wind out of an enormous flame storm I could see already forming on
>the horizon. As for the status of my profile; because I have been here since
>before 1999 and there is already *WAY* to much personal details in all those CCC
>archives, if I you don't mind I'd rather leave it at that for now. Thanks for
>your opening book advice Chandler, I'll give it a try if I ever buy something
>from Chessbase.
>
>Don't take me too seriously, I had not enough sleep I suppose, good weekend,
>
>Eelco
 Thank you Sir!
For people that do not know me, I do not Post Opinions, I Post facts..
To disagree is fine, but then you are arguing with people like Dr. Hyatt,
Bruce Moreland, & other Programmers that can confirm what I Post.
The Fruit Programmer in another Thread said he used minimum Hash, and asked us
to guess why.
Well.. get some sleep, and have a great Thanksgiving.
Best Wishes,
Chan



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.