Author: Uri Blass
Date: 03:12:50 11/19/05
Go up one level in this thread
On November 19, 2005 at 06:08:56, George Tsavdaris wrote: >On November 19, 2005 at 05:07:18, Andre van Ark wrote: > >>Hi uri, >> >>"Fruit is not a bean counter engine.Fruit2.2 is one of the best engines." >> >>Ok, ok, one of the best beancounters ;-)) >> >>Only joking, of course Fruit is a very, very strong engine it is number 1 in >>several list. But also is visible that a lot of things have to be improved. > > The frightening thing is what will be the Fruit's strength after all these >_visible_ indeed, things will be corrected? No other top engine has so many >missing things to add, yet Fruit is still number-1. I wonder if Fabien fixes all >this things then what would happen?!? I do not agree that no other top engine has so many missing things to add. If they are weaker than fruit then it is clear that they have missing things to add. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.