Author: George Tsavdaris
Date: 03:18:24 11/19/05
Go up one level in this thread
On November 19, 2005 at 06:12:50, Uri Blass wrote: >On November 19, 2005 at 06:08:56, George Tsavdaris wrote: > >>On November 19, 2005 at 05:07:18, Andre van Ark wrote: >> >>>Hi uri, >>> >>>"Fruit is not a bean counter engine.Fruit2.2 is one of the best engines." >>> >>>Ok, ok, one of the best beancounters ;-)) >>> >>>Only joking, of course Fruit is a very, very strong engine it is number 1 in >>>several list. But also is visible that a lot of things have to be improved. >> >> The frightening thing is what will be the Fruit's strength after all these >>_visible_ indeed, things will be corrected? No other top engine has so many >>missing things to add, yet Fruit is still number-1. I wonder if Fabien fixes all >>this things then what would happen?!? > >I do not agree that no other top engine has so many missing things to add. >If they are weaker than fruit then it is clear that they have missing things to >add. Actually i agree, but i mean visible things...... > >Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.