Author: Günther Simon
Date: 03:57:04 11/19/05
Go up one level in this thread
On November 19, 2005 at 06:18:24, George Tsavdaris wrote: >On November 19, 2005 at 06:12:50, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On November 19, 2005 at 06:08:56, George Tsavdaris wrote: >> >>>On November 19, 2005 at 05:07:18, Andre van Ark wrote: >>> >>>>Hi uri, >>>> >>>>"Fruit is not a bean counter engine.Fruit2.2 is one of the best engines." >>>> >>>>Ok, ok, one of the best beancounters ;-)) >>>> >>>>Only joking, of course Fruit is a very, very strong engine it is number 1 in >>>>several list. But also is visible that a lot of things have to be improved. >>> >>> The frightening thing is what will be the Fruit's strength after all these >>>_visible_ indeed, things will be corrected? No other top engine has so many >>>missing things to add, yet Fruit is still number-1. I wonder if Fabien fixes all >>>this things then what would happen?!? >> >>I do not agree that no other top engine has so many missing things to add. >>If they are weaker than fruit then it is clear that they have missing things to >>add. > >Actually i agree, but i mean visible things...... People forget incredibly fast. What about F9s very visible huge endgame blunders in certain positions(dozens of them were posted here a couple of weeks ago)? ;-) Still it seems it is en par with Fruit 2.21. It also depends on which program is en vogue in CCC currently and therefore screened more than others. Guenther > >> >>Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.