Author: Kurt Utzinger
Date: 05:38:29 11/19/05
Go up one level in this thread
On November 19, 2005 at 07:51:20, Sandro Necchi wrote:
>On November 19, 2005 at 07:40:18, Kurt Utzinger wrote:
>
>>On November 19, 2005 at 07:25:09, Sandro Necchi wrote:
>>
>>>Hi,
>>>
>>>according to people who have tested both Columbus' egg 9g and 9L these settings
>>>in Shredder 9 are able to win against Fruit2.2.1
>>>
>>>Ciao
>>>Sandro
>>
>> Hi Sandro
>> Thanks for this information. Have you any
>> links to such won matches? The main question
>> however remains: does any of your special S9
>> settings achieve a better overall score in
>> 50 games matches vs 6-8 other engines? Only
>> then can we take it that such a specific
>> setting could be stronger than default S9
>> Regards
>> Kurt
>
[...]
>Overall those settings; especially 9g and 9L seems an improvement, but I am
>trying to find one which wins against Shredder 9 too.
But is this not simply a waste of time.
If a setting has a better overall score
vs other engines, there is no need at all
to improve vs the default params of the
same engine in my opinion. Or what could be
the reason for such testing ... you will
never see a match in an important (public)
tournament between S9 default vs S9 X. I
don't see the point.
Kurt
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.