Author: Sandro Necchi
Date: 06:47:32 11/19/05
Go up one level in this thread
On November 19, 2005 at 08:38:29, Kurt Utzinger wrote: >On November 19, 2005 at 07:51:20, Sandro Necchi wrote: > >>On November 19, 2005 at 07:40:18, Kurt Utzinger wrote: >> >>>On November 19, 2005 at 07:25:09, Sandro Necchi wrote: >>> >>>>Hi, >>>> >>>>according to people who have tested both Columbus' egg 9g and 9L these settings >>>>in Shredder 9 are able to win against Fruit2.2.1 >>>> >>>>Ciao >>>>Sandro >>> >>> Hi Sandro >>> Thanks for this information. Have you any >>> links to such won matches? The main question >>> however remains: does any of your special S9 >>> settings achieve a better overall score in >>> 50 games matches vs 6-8 other engines? Only >>> then can we take it that such a specific >>> setting could be stronger than default S9 >>> Regards >>> Kurt >> >[...] >>Overall those settings; especially 9g and 9L seems an improvement, but I am >>trying to find one which wins against Shredder 9 too. > > But is this not simply a waste of time. > If a setting has a better overall score > vs other engines, there is no need at all > to improve vs the default params of the > same engine in my opinion. Or what could be > the reason for such testing ... you will > never see a match in an important (public) > tournament between S9 default vs S9 X. I > don't see the point. > Kurt Hi, well I think there is a better setting than the one I discovered so far, so I am trying to find it. I am testing 9Q now. Sandro
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.