Author: Uri Blass
Date: 12:14:57 11/19/05
Go up one level in this thread
On November 19, 2005 at 15:02:59, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >On November 18, 2005 at 17:28:55, JNoomen wrote: > >So Jeroen, > >Regarding the game fruit-diep : > >It was not we who fell in your trep, but an already tested line by Arturo in the >past trapped you. He had already tested with the f7-f5? move against Fruit and >realized after some games that this Kasparov line is 1-0 always. We love to play >that line against Kasparov with white too. > >However when removing the move f5 from book. It was all 0-1 against Fruit. It >doesn't know about opposite wings. If it would have played Kb1 from book, some >move later it would have lost the game, as it gets a massive amount of points >for winning pawns and not for king safety, unlike Diep, which happily sacraficed >a pawn against Fruit and won the game eyes-closed. Fruit2.2.1 also could find b3 with enough time and after b3 it can easily see small advantage for black so it is clearly wrong that fruit gets a massive amount of points for winning pawns. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.