Author: KarinsDad
Date: 13:47:55 03/19/99
Go up one level in this thread
On March 19, 1999 at 15:01:02, blass uri wrote: > >On March 19, 1999 at 14:00:16, KarinsDad wrote: > >>On March 18, 1999 at 07:01:52, blass uri wrote: >> >> >>Uri, >> >>Why exactly is this unfair? >> >>This implies that having opponent specific knowledge is unfair (e.g. Anand >>having knowledge about Kasparov). >> >>Please explain. >> >>KarinsDad :) > >It is unfair because the rules should be equal for all the programs. > >I also agree that if anand buy a copy of kasparov and learn specific knowledge >about the copy of kasparov by games then it is unfair. > >Fortunately anand cannot buy a copy of kasparov. > >Uri A few more details please. Is this unfair since one or a few programs have the functionality or is it unfair that some of the programs are using the functionality but some of the others (although they have the functionality) do not have it turned on. I must have missed a posting that explained the situation. Thanks, KarinsDad
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.