Author: Arturo Ochoa
Date: 20:44:47 11/19/05
Go up one level in this thread
On November 19, 2005 at 17:28:47, Roger Brown wrote: >>I had decided not to reply all the garbage written here. However, my patience >>with the baby crying is over. Since you don't stop to cry again and again, I am >>very confident that Diep would beat you again. Diep already did it with the >>Erdogan Book as well as with my lines that you use to call "craps" in every >>Tournaments. In this specific Tournament, every Jeroen's line was not able to >>beat my "crappy lines", eventhough you had the advantages to be in 3 engines: >>Fruit, ProDeo and Sjeng (all version of your book). > > >Hello Arturo, > >I am not qualified to comment on opening preparation as I am not an expert. > Neither I am qualified to understimate the prepraration of my opponents if they made a better decision and win a game. >However your preparation and engine was superior here. It was just one game. If we can talk about superior preparation, I say Zappa + Erdogan were superior again. > >Can I ask - as far as you can share any information at all - what do you do in >preparing for a tournament? Your fame in this regard is already well >established. I don't think that I can consider a celebrity of the bookers. I only help Diep as a hobby since Computer Chess is not my main activity. Sorry, according to certain bookers, I am not qualified as a booker. Therefore, to mention here my preparation is useless for everybody. Jeroen Noomen's "great experience" and "objective knowledge" is too superior for all the posters. So, he can begin to mention all his methods of preparations. > >In fact so well established that the negative comments from you are totally >unworthy of your demonstrated skill or knowledge. I don't know. Vincent and I tried to do our best effort in 2 months. Some games were Ok, other games were bad. > >You are good, very good. Why the bitterness and hostility? Incorrect. Zappa + Erdogan has proved to be a terrific weapon for the last 2 Tournaments. I don't claim that Diep and I are the best team if we still loose games by book or an engine blunder. > >I thought victory made everything taste sweet. > >Enjoy the fruits of your preparation and Diep's might. > > >>Well, as far as I know, Fritz 9 is a chessbase engine or you are accussing us ob >>being clones of Fritz 9? I know, Diep and Fritz 9 are different engines, and >>they play differently. If you want to know what we prepared there, wait until >>the next Official Tournament. > > > >Arturo, do you really believe this? No. Jerooen Noomen showed a game against Fritz 9. That is not a proof that his analysis is correct. > >Do you think that anybody believes that this could ever have been contemplated >by the poster? > >I believe that the intention is to show that a strong engine may play such and >such a move. That is all anyone can do until the commercial Diep is released >for sale I suppose. > I don't agree at all about the intention of the post, but this is your oponion.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.