Author: Arturo Ochoa
Date: 20:57:49 11/19/05
Go up one level in this thread
On November 19, 2005 at 17:15:51, Uri Blass wrote: >On November 19, 2005 at 16:19:19, Arturo Ochoa wrote: > >>On November 19, 2005 at 15:39:50, JNoomen wrote: >> >>>On November 19, 2005 at 15:02:59, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >>> >>>Hi Vincent, >>> >>>As I proposed to you: I would like to play a rematch Fruit - Diep with the move >>>19.Kb1 being played. As I now have a 3-0 with Fruit against Fritz 9 with 19.Kb1, >>>I am confident that Fruit will beat Diep as well. >>> >>>So name a time, a place and a date, I am ready for it! >>> >>>Jeroen >>> >>> >>>PS For the readers here at CCC: I proposed to play a game with 19.Kb1 after the >>>match ended, which was refused by Vincent >>> >>> >>> >> >> >>I had decided not to reply all the garbage written here. However, my patience >>with the baby crying is over. Since you don't stop to cry again and again, I am >>very confident that Diep would beat you again. > >I do not think that it is correct to describe JNoomen behaviour as crying. That is not the first time that I beat a Jeroen Noomen line. > >Playing against Fritz at least show evidence that fruit may beat some opponents >with Kb1. Incorrect. It only shows that Fruit can beat Fritz in certain lines. >I think that it is clear that it is not a proof that it could beat diep with >Kb1. > Correct. I agree. > > Diep already did it with the >>Erdogan Book as well as with my lines that you use to call "craps" in every >>Tournaments. > >I do not remember JNoomen using the word "craps" about your lines. > Ask Jeroen Noomen what he mentioned about my Najdorf lines during past Tournament. > In this specific Tournament, every Jeroen's line was not able to >>beat my "crappy lines", eventhough you had the advantages to be in 3 engines: >>Fruit, ProDeo and Sjeng (all version of your book). > >Diep was white in the case of Prodeo and Sjeng and only drew the game. If you check the games, you will see that the ProDeo game was a simple drawish line and the Sjeng game was impossible to go more than a draw. Those lines were Ok for the black side. I am not satisfied about those games although the resulst were easy draws. > >I guess that Prodeo one processor is weaker than Diep with many processors so >draw with black against Diep is a success for the book author. Not really. ProDeo is known to be a very well tuned engine. It is not easy to beat ProDeo. Only saying the book was important is only underestimating the engine. > >> >>Diep doesn't have to play a specific line or game against you, because we won >>the battle on that game. It is not a problem for Diep or me, if you failed in >>that game. > >Diep does not have to play a game but if Vincent does not want to play a game it >is better if he says nothing about it. He can say anything as Jeroen Noomen directed the comment towards Diep. > >If the reason for not telling information is that you want to hide your book >preperation then I see no reason to tell part of the information. It was my initial intention until I continued seeing the flow of the thread. > >If that claim is misinformation(I do not claim that it is the case and I do not >know) then there may be a reason to do it but I think that it is immoral to do >it. > On the contrary, it is not moral to justify the lost of the game from the "mistakes" of the opponent. >Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.