Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Dutch Open: the story of the game Fruit - Diep

Author: JNoomen

Date: 00:28:47 11/20/05

Go up one level in this thread


On November 19, 2005 at 16:19:19, Arturo Ochoa wrote:

Hi Arturo,

There is no need to reveil any of your preparation, as you were out of book
earlier than Fruit. Diep calculated the move ... Qc7 by itself. As I stated in
my posting the position after 19.Kb1! is better for white. Not only I did this
by giving a very thorough explanation why this is the case, I also provided
games as a proof. Computers misplay this position as they overrate their attack.

I proposed Vincent to play a rematch to find out whether his claim 'we all
prepared this and Fruit will always lose against Diep from this position' is
true. He declined. So here I am doing it again: we play a game Fruit - Diep from
the position after 19.Kb1.

Jeroen



>On November 19, 2005 at 15:39:50, JNoomen wrote:
>
>>On November 19, 2005 at 15:02:59, Vincent Diepeveen wrote:
>>
>>Hi Vincent,
>>
>>As I proposed to you: I would like to play a rematch Fruit - Diep with the move
>>19.Kb1 being played. As I now have a 3-0 with Fruit against Fritz 9 with 19.Kb1,
>>I am confident that Fruit will beat Diep as well.
>>
>>So name a time, a place and a date, I am ready for it!
>>
>>Jeroen
>>
>>
>>PS  For the readers here at CCC: I proposed to play a game with 19.Kb1 after the
>>match ended, which was refused by Vincent
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>I had decided not to reply all the garbage written here. However, my patience
>with the baby crying is over. Since you don't stop to cry again and again, I am
>very confident that Diep would beat you again. Diep already did it with the
>Erdogan Book as well as with my lines that you use to call "craps" in every
>Tournaments. In this specific Tournament, every Jeroen's line was not able to
>beat my "crappy lines", eventhough you had the advantages to be in 3 engines:
>Fruit, ProDeo and Sjeng (all version of your book).
>
>Diep doesn't have to play a specific line or game against you, because we won
>the battle on that game. It is not a problem for Diep or me, if you failed in
>that game.
>
>I won't discuss my prepration here because I won't reveal what I prepared
>against your "great openings". Second, it would be very silly to play after a
>certain line that you have "prepared" very well.
>
>Well, as far as I know, Fritz 9 is a chessbase engine or you are accussing us ob
>being clones of Fritz 9? I know, Diep and Fritz 9 are different engines, and
>they play differently. If you want to know what we prepared there, wait until
>the next Official Tournament.
>
>Arturo Ochoa M.
>
>PD: Your analysis is lack of concrete variations by the way.......



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.