Author: Inmann Werner
Date: 15:14:36 03/19/99
Go up one level in this thread
On March 19, 1999 at 18:08:02, Dann Corbit wrote: >Actually, something very strange is at work here. Now that I look closely, the >data objects are the same size. Are you sure that you have the optimization >settings unchanged? Maybe you used a debug build for timing on the P90? Did >you change the instruction mix? > >My previous remarks assumed that you expanded the tables. Since they are the >same size, it is not the memory I/O that is a problem. > >Both lookups should be of identical speed. I agree!!! I am sure. I changed nothing. Only the definition (char * ...) and the mallocs. All the rest is the same code. But I have all optimizations on in both variants. The only thing, I can think is, that there is problem with prozessor caching. In same way, the ram must be organized different. The traffic is the same. But 30% disturbs me, although P90 is a old machine. Werner
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.