Author: Uri Blass
Date: 11:19:45 11/20/05
Go up one level in this thread
On November 20, 2005 at 14:12:04, Drexel,Michael wrote: >On November 20, 2005 at 14:04:31, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On November 20, 2005 at 13:06:24, Jouni Uski wrote: >> >>>I am 99,999% sure after Bc3 Hydra wins. >>> >>>Jouni >> >>Of course he lost but it is not clear why he played Rg8 and Kg8-h8-g8-h8 with a >>draw. >> >>Fruit see no strong move against Kg8 that I play >> >>When a GM play even worse than me then I start to suspect that maybe he lost on >>purpose. >> >>26...Rag8 may be an interesting move to play against a human(and maybe >>objectively it is not a mistake) but it should be never played against a >>computer unless you see a forced win. >> >>Uri > >There was no need to play for a draw. You can play for a win without any risks >in this position as black. >For example 26...Bc8 with the idea Rb8,Rb7,Qd8,Rbg7 > >Michael In this case it is even worse. If black has clear winning chances even without sacrificing material then this sacrifice is even clearly wrong against humans because there is no reason to take unnecessary risks. In this case the question is what is the reason that GM play so weak games against computers. I cannot understand it. Even if they lose on purpose they can lose on purpose in a way that is going to seem more logical to the spectators. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.