Author: Roger D Davis
Date: 10:37:30 11/21/05
Go up one level in this thread
On November 21, 2005 at 11:51:40, David Dahlem wrote: >On November 21, 2005 at 09:21:49, Roger D Davis wrote: > >>On November 21, 2005 at 03:54:15, Rick Hagen wrote: >> >>>On November 20, 2005 at 23:59:28, Axel Schumacher wrote: >>> >>>>Blitz 4+1, both engines shortbook (max 4 ply), Athlon 2100+, 32 MB RAM, No >>>>Tablebases: >>>> >>>>Blitz:4'+1" 0 >>>> >>>> >>>>1 Toga II 1.1 2812 +220 1101½0111000½½11111011½1110 18.0/27 >>>>2 Fritz 9 2863 -220 0010½1000111½½00000100½0001 9.0/27 >>>> >>>> >>> >>>Running a nunn2 match vs Fritz 7 atm. (halfway through) >>> >>>TogaII 1.1-Fritz7_nunn2, Blitz:5'+5" >>> >>> >>>1 Toga II 1.1 11½½11½0101½½111111½1 16.0/21 >>>2 Fritz 7 00½½00½1010½½000000½0 5.0/21 >>> >>>P4 3Ghz >>>HT 128MB >>>TBs=off >>> >>>Rick (impressed) >> >>Ouch. I would have thought the 5 + 5 results would be a little better for Fritz >>than the 4 + 1 results. Of course, it's too few games, but when one side has a >>200% or 300% advantage, it begins to look statistically significant. >> >>Roger > >Well, one match was against Fritz 9 and the other match was against Fritz 7, so >does comparing these match results mean anything at all?? > >Regards >Dave Ah...I didn't notice it was Fritz 7. Still, it's remarkable to me that any free program can beat a 2-version numbers-old market and strength leader by 300%. Still jaw-dropping, at least to me. I would, of course, love to see the results repeated at longer time controls with many more games. Roger
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.