Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Analysis Shredder 9.1 UCI

Author: Eduard Nemeth

Date: 12:38:59 11/21/05

Go up one level in this thread


On November 21, 2005 at 14:55:58, Arifur Rahman wrote:

>The position after 39 Qg3 seems to be a difficult for the chess programs, not
>only for Fritz 9.
>
>I checked the position with Shredder 9.

Ponomariov - Fritz, Man vs. Machine, Bilbao05

[D]6k1/5p2/pn1p4/N2p2p1/PP1Pp2q/1BrbP1QP/6K1/4R3 b - - 0 1

Analysis by Shredder 9.1 UCI (only on a P3 600 MHz):

39...Dxg3+ 40.Kxg3 f5 41.Tg1 f4+ 42.Kh2 fxe3 43.Txg5+ Kf7 44.Tg1 Lc4 45.Lxc4
dxc4 46.b5 axb5 47.axb5 Ta3 48.Sc6 Tb3 49.Tf1+ Ke6
  -+  (-2.40)   Tiefe: 14/33   00:00:27  3591kN
39...Dxg3+ 40.Kxg3 f5 41.Tg1 f4+ 42.Kh2 fxe3 43.Txg5+ Kh7 44.Tg1 Lc2 45.Lxc2
Txc2+ 46.Kg3 Sxa4
  -+  (-2.64)   Tiefe: 15/36   00:00:46  6445kN
39...Dxg3+ 40.Kxg3 f5 41.Tg1 f4+ 42.Kh2 fxe3 43.Txg5+ Kh7 44.Tg1 Lc2 45.Lxc2
Txc2+ 46.Kg3 Sxa4 47.Kf4 Th2 48.Kg3 Tf2 49.Sb7
  -+  (-2.69)   Tiefe: 16/39   00:01:17  10800kN

(Nemeth, Privat 21.11.2005)


>
>After 8 minutes at depth 19 Shredder 9 likes the move 39...Bc2?? also. Shredder
>rates the move as the second best (with eval -2.6) after the first choice Qg3.
>
>Maybe both Fritz and Shredder would discard the move totally with faster
>hardware at deeper depth. Maybe Fritz didnt have enough time at move 39, just
>before the time control.
>
>
>/Arifur



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.