Author: Mario Thomas
Date: 13:24:09 11/21/05
Go up one level in this thread
On November 21, 2005 at 15:38:59, Eduard Nemeth wrote: >On November 21, 2005 at 14:55:58, Arifur Rahman wrote: > >>The position after 39 Qg3 seems to be a difficult for the chess programs, not >>only for Fritz 9. >> >>I checked the position with Shredder 9. > >Ponomariov - Fritz, Man vs. Machine, Bilbao05 > >[D]6k1/5p2/pn1p4/N2p2p1/PP1Pp2q/1BrbP1QP/6K1/4R3 b - - 0 1 >11152352: Ponomariov - Fritz, II Man vs Machine, Bilbao 2005 6k1/5p2/pn1p4/N2p2p1/PP1Pp2q/1BrbP1QP/6K1/4R3 b - - 0 1 Analysis by Fritz 9:AMD Sampron 2200+ 1500 MHz 39...Nc4 40.Qxh4 gxh4 41.Bd1 Nxa5 42.bxa5 f6 43.Rg1 Kf7 -+ (-2.14) Depth: 7/19 00:00:00 34kN 39...Nc4 40.Qxh4 gxh4 41.Bd1 Nxa5 42.bxa5 Kf8 43.Rg1 Ra3 44.Kf2 Ra2+ -+ (-2.15) Depth: 8/19 00:00:00 87kN 39...Nc4 40.Qxh4 gxh4 41.Bd1 Nxa5 42.bxa5 Kf8 43.Rg1 Ra3 44.Kf2 Ra2+ 45.Ke1 -+ (-2.15) Depth: 9/23 00:00:00 227kN 39...Qxg3+! -+ (-2.15) Depth: 9/26 00:00:00 301kN 39...Qxg3+! -+ (-2.31) Depth: 9/26 00:00:00 354kN 39...Qxg3+ 40.Kxg3 f5 41.Kf2 Kf7 42.Bd1 Kf6 43.Kg3 Bc2 44.Bxc2 Rxc2 -+ (-2.53) Depth: 9/26 00:00:00 462kN 39...Qxg3+ 40.Kxg3 f5 41.Kf2 Kf7 42.Bd1 f4 43.Rh1 fxe3+ 44.Kxe3 Bb5+ 45.Kd2 Rd3+ 46.Ke2 Nxa4 -+ (-2.59) Depth: 10/29 00:00:01 820kN 39...Qxg3+ 40.Kxg3 f5 41.Kh2 Kf7 42.h4 gxh4 43.Kh3 Bc4 44.Bd1 f4 45.Kxh4 fxe3 46.Nc6 -+ (-2.63) Depth: 11/29 00:00:02 1727kN 39...Qxg3+ 40.Kxg3 f5 41.Kh2 Kf7 42.h4 gxh4 43.Kh3 Bc4 44.Bd1 f4 45.Kxh4 fxe3 46.Kg5 Ke7 47.Nc6+ -+ (-2.61) Depth: 12/29 00:00:04 2629kN 39...Qxg3+ 40.Kxg3 f5 41.Kh2 Kf7 42.h4 gxh4 43.Kh3 Bc4 44.Bd1 f4 45.Kxh4 fxe3 46.Kg5 Ke7 47.Nc6+ Kd7 -+ (-2.53) Depth: 13/33 00:00:06 4714kN 39...Qxg3+ 40.Kxg3 f5 41.Kh2 Kf7 42.h4 gxh4 43.Kh3 Bc4 44.Bd1 f4 45.Kxh4 Rxe3 46.Rxe3 fxe3 -+ (-2.65) Depth: 14/32 00:00:15 12019kN 39...Qxg3+ 40.Kxg3 f5 41.Kh2 Kf7 42.h4 gxh4 43.Kh3 Bc4 44.Bd1 f4 45.Kxh4 Rxe3 46.Rxe3 fxe3 -+ (-2.65) Depth: 15/35 00:00:33 27007kN 39...Qxg3+ 40.Kxg3 f5 41.Kh2 Kf7 42.h4 gxh4 43.Kh3 Bc4 44.Bd1 f4 45.Kxh4 Rxe3 46.Rxe3 fxe3 -+ (-2.50) Depth: 16/40 00:01:26 70428kN 39...Qxg3+ 40.Kxg3 f5 41.Kh2 f4 42.Rg1 Kh7 43.Rxg5 fxe3 44.Rg1 Bc2 45.Bxc2 Rxc2+ 46.Kg3 -+ (-2.68) Depth: 17/48 00:03:35 178877kN 39...Qxg3+ 40.Kxg3 f5 41.Kh2 f4 42.Rg1 Kh7 43.Rxg5 fxe3 44.Rg1 Bc2 45.Bxc2 Rxc2+ 46.Kg3 -+ (-2.68) Depth: 18/50 00:07:21 366489kN 39...Nc4! -+ (-2.69) Depth: 18/50 00:10:03 506916kN 39...Nc4 40.Qxh4 gxh4 41.Bxc4 dxc4 42.b5 axb5 43.axb5 Rc2+ 44.Kg1 Rb2 45.Rc1 d5 46.Nc6 Kf8 47.Na7 Ke8 48.Nc8 Kd7 49.Na7 -+ (-2.74) Depth: 18/50 00:10:38 538218kN 39...Nc4 40.Qxh4 gxh4 41.Bxc4 dxc4 42.b5 axb5 43.axb5 Ra3 44.Nb7 c3 45.Nxd6 Rb3 46.b6 Rxb6 47.Nc8 Rg6+ 48.Kf2 Kf8 49.Ra1 -+ (-2.85) Depth: 19/43 00:13:26 687580kN 39...Qxg3+! -+ (-2.85) Depth: 19/48 00:18:28 938309kN 39...Qxg3+! -+ (-3.01) Depth: 19/48 00:23:40 1195854kN 39...Qxg3+! -+ (-3.29) Depth: 20/55 01:09:45 3456034kN (Thomas, Hearst 21.11.2005) >Analysis by Shredder 9.1 UCI (only on a P3 600 MHz): > >39...Dxg3+ 40.Kxg3 f5 41.Tg1 f4+ 42.Kh2 fxe3 43.Txg5+ Kf7 44.Tg1 Lc4 45.Lxc4 >dxc4 46.b5 axb5 47.axb5 Ta3 48.Sc6 Tb3 49.Tf1+ Ke6 > -+ (-2.40) Tiefe: 14/33 00:00:27 3591kN >39...Dxg3+ 40.Kxg3 f5 41.Tg1 f4+ 42.Kh2 fxe3 43.Txg5+ Kh7 44.Tg1 Lc2 45.Lxc2 >Txc2+ 46.Kg3 Sxa4 > -+ (-2.64) Tiefe: 15/36 00:00:46 6445kN >39...Dxg3+ 40.Kxg3 f5 41.Tg1 f4+ 42.Kh2 fxe3 43.Txg5+ Kh7 44.Tg1 Lc2 45.Lxc2 >Txc2+ 46.Kg3 Sxa4 47.Kf4 Th2 48.Kg3 Tf2 49.Sb7 > -+ (-2.69) Tiefe: 16/39 00:01:17 10800kN > >(Nemeth, Privat 21.11.2005) > > >> >>After 8 minutes at depth 19 Shredder 9 likes the move 39...Bc2?? also. Shredder >>rates the move as the second best (with eval -2.6) after the first choice Qg3. >> >>Maybe both Fritz and Shredder would discard the move totally with faster >>hardware at deeper depth. Maybe Fritz didnt have enough time at move 39, just >>before the time control. >> >> >>/Arifur
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.