Author: Rick Hagen
Date: 13:29:09 11/21/05
Go up one level in this thread
On November 21, 2005 at 16:10:45, Mario Thomas wrote: >11152352: Ponomariov - Fritz, II Man vs Machine, Bilbao 2005 >[D]6k1/5p2/pn1p4/N2p2p1/PP1Pp2q/1BrbP1QP/6K1/4R3 b - - 0 1 > >Analysis by Fritz 9: > [...] >39...Nc4 40.Qxh4 gxh4 41.Bxc4 dxc4 42.b5 axb5 43.axb5 Ra3 44.Nb7 c3 45.Nxd6 Rb3 >46.b6 Rxb6 47.Nc8 Rg6+ 48.Kf2 Kf8 49.Ra1 > -+ (-2.85) Depth: 19/43 00:13:26 687580kN >39...Qxg3+! > -+ (-2.85) Depth: 19/48 00:18:28 938309kN >39...Qxg3+! > -+ (-3.01) Depth: 19/48 00:23:40 1195854kN >39...Qxg3+! > -+ (-3.29) Depth: 20/55 01:09:45 3456034kN > >(Thomas, Hearst 21.11.2005) Try analysis in multi-PV F9 gives Bc2 in the 'top 3' with close scores. If this F9-Bilbao version is an 'improved' version over standard F9... and, like the F8-Bilbao, one has to pay for(!), they can count me out. All I want is a bug-free Fritz 9 version. (without paying for the 'upgrade') RH PS. I read somewhere that Ponomariov strategically outplayed F9... Errm no, not really... (F9 outplayed Khalifman in the first round though)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.