Author: Dieter Buerssner
Date: 15:17:17 11/21/05
Go up one level in this thread
On November 20, 2005 at 17:38:25, robert flesher wrote: > 17.01 0:18 +2.36 1...Qxf2 2.Qxf2 Rd1+ 3.Qg1 Rxg1+ 4.Kxg1 g5 5.g3 Kg7 6.Kf2 >gxf4 7.gxf4 Kg6 8.Kf3 Kf5 9.b4 h5 10.h3 h4 11.Ke3 e5 12.fxe5 Kxe5 13.Kf3 f5 >14.Ke3 f4+ (17.048.326) 937 >best move: Qc5xf2 time: 0:30.672 min n/s: 914.059 nodes: 21.416.414 >best move: Qc5xf2 time: 0:03.437 min > 18.00 0:00 +2.36 1...Qxf2 2.Qxf2 Rd1+ (1.088.111) 1700 >best move: Qc5xf2 time: 0:09.297 min n/s: 1.736.592 nodes: 11.930.393 > 18.00 0:00 +2.36 1...Qxf2 2.Qxf2 (1.029.887) 1943 Very impressive. Seems, Ktulu has a very good "static" (supported by search, of course) evaluation of the resulting pawn endgame here. Do you have the patience, to try for a bit longer? I don't understand all of the output. 18 s for the first PV at depth 17, followed by 0 s for depth 18? Lack of more responses until now may indicate, that the position is really hard for most engines. Regards, Dieter
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.