Author: Uri Blass
Date: 01:55:55 11/22/05
Go up one level in this thread
On November 22, 2005 at 04:43:43, Thorsten Czub wrote: >On November 22, 2005 at 03:52:52, Andreas Guettinger wrote: >>That CB statement is ridiculous. As you can see from the analysis I posted on >>the previous thread, Hiarcs 9.6 evaluates Qxg3 and Bc2 with a difference of +3 >>after 10min search on a terribly old 400 Mhz computer. >>Furthermore it doesn't explain why other users Fritz 9 seems to stick Qxg3. >> >>- Andy > > >yes. Maybe chessbase was mistaken and NOT Fritz9 is the one with the human >knowledge but hiarcs 10. > >somebody in the marketing area of the company made a mistake and wanted to say >hiarcs10 when he said fritz9. > >In opposite to Fritz9, hiarcs IS an intelligent program (as the name says so). I do not think that this mistake is related to missing human knowledge in Fritz and it is probably a bug. Fruit also has no problem with the relevant position and I heard no claims that fruit has human knowledge. Not that I believe that the improvement from Fritz8 to Fritz9 is about implementing human knowledge but the last mistake proves nothing about it. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.