Author: Wang Kesi
Date: 08:20:08 11/22/05
Go up one level in this thread
On November 22, 2005 at 10:54:39, Uri Blass wrote: >On November 22, 2005 at 10:37:31, Wang Kesi wrote: > >>On November 22, 2005 at 10:24:25, Greg Simpson wrote: >> >>>If you make the GMs play out such boring positions it's going to be hard to get >>>them to another event like this. >> >>Well said, Greg. Your comment is penetrating! But I prefer that the program >>itself decide whether it will go on the game, instead of the programmer. Such >>consideration seems to be beyond chess itself. Can I call it the privilege of >>GMs? I guess that it is more and more difficult to invite high rating player in >>such event these years! >> >>Regards, >> >>Wang Kesi > >I do not think that it is difficult but only that sponsors does not have enough >interest. > >If they pay enough money GM's will be happy to play. > >Uri Uri, I mean that GMs are more and more difficult to beat computers, therefore they may be unwillingly to face computer for fear of the delination of their reputation. Thus the sponsor has to raise the money to attract high rating GMs. It is not easy to find such sponsors, though. And such situation made things difficult. However, I agree with you concerning the importance of money. Even Kasparov would take back his claim and play computer once more if there was enough money! I was so idealistic that I often overlook the money factor. Regards, Wang Kesi
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.