Author: A. Steen
Date: 13:19:48 11/22/05
Go up one level in this thread
On November 22, 2005 at 16:04:54, Uri Blass wrote: >On November 22, 2005 at 15:22:18, A. Steen wrote: > >>On November 22, 2005 at 06:25:35, Ted Summers wrote: >> >>>I read here on this forum that other users of Fritz 9 did not have this blunder. >>>So I gave my copy of Fritz 9 a shot at the game to annotate. My Fritz 9 not only >>>see's 39. ...Bc2 as a big mistake, but it states that Qxg3 was winning for >>>black. >> >> >>What do you mean by "big mistake"? >> >>Did it show (in multi-variation mode) Bc2 with a positive (i.e. favouring white) >>evaluation?? >> >>Mine certainly does not. It prefers QxQ, but >> >>Please explain what you mean by "big mistake". The consequences from the two >>UPP are beyond the horizon of any of these computers IMO at move 39. > >even if you draw instead of winning it is a big mistake. > >I am not sure if Bc2 is the losing mistake and maybe black can draw even after >Bc2 by 41...Bxb3 but Fruit can see score that is close to draw easily after Bc2 :: snip Fruit analysis :: >Uri Sure, all of what you say is agreed. Additionally I feel it is not just a draw after .. Bc2, but it may be lost for black. But the OP claimed his FRITZ 9 "see's [sic] 39. ...Bc2 as a big mistake". His Fritz 9. Not Fruit. Not human. Hence I have asked a question in- http://www.talkchess.com/forums/1/message.html?463714 My 9.0.0.0 F9 even after 1GN search after forcing .. Bc2 still thinks black is better than OK, evaluation around -0.5. Does anyone have a 9.0.0.x (x>0) F9? Best, A.S.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.