Author: A. Steen
Date: 14:16:15 11/22/05
Go up one level in this thread
On November 22, 2005 at 16:43:08, Oreopoulos Kostas wrote: >Dear A.Steen > >My Fide rating is 2285. Amazingly high, given your analyses and reasoning. Have you visited Myanmar? >What is yours? ( i did search for some steen at fide but no luck) Much higher than yours. Since every really strong player who posts here gets attacked, you won't get more than that, and all precautions have been taken including the use of a relay IP. [D]6rk/3b3q/npNp4/2pPp3/1PP1Ppr1/P1Q5/5RP1/4BRK1 w - - 0 34 >I think you are really a very weak player. Hahaha, this is from the "strong" player (you) who gave the most low-quality analysis sequence: 34. .. "Ne5 de5 Qe5 Qg7 Bc3" as evidence of white's superiority? Jaja! When your Q-g7 is a total and idiotic blunder, and further you even miss the best (by far) refutation to it (Q-h5+, not the mediocre Bc3)? Of course you are embarrassed by your silly blunder, so you snip out all that. >This position is totally open. It is not open in the sense you use the term. It only looks open to weak players. There are forcing continuations leading to perpetual check. >But i guess that is how much you can understand. From one such as you, I must take that as an honour badge. :) >ofcourse ne5 leads to a draw, but that was to show you that a 15sec analysys >can bring many ideas to a position. So let us stop and understand your "logic"- I gave a position and said it was a dead draw. [D]6rk/3b3q/npNp4/2pPp3/1PP1Ppr1/P1Q5/5RP1/4BRK1 w - - 0 34 You told me the position I gave was not, in fact white was better and as proof you gave a sequence. Your sequence is proven to be a nonsense, of very poor quality. When corrected, it shows that it leads to a forced draw, You then admit "ofcourse [sic] ne5 leads to a draw" How many defeats must you receive?? >for example after > >[D] 6rk/3b2q1/npNp2rn/2pPp3/1PP1Ppp1/P1BQ3P/5RP1/3B1RK1 w - - > >white can play 28... Qh7 29. Nb5 hg4 30 Ng4 Ng4 32 Bg4 Bg4 33 hg4 Rh6 34 Qf3! += Let us look at the quality of your analysis. :) You say "white can play 28... Qh7". Excuse me. That is BLACK playing. Not WHITE. Your FEN position & diagram show it is white to play, but your move sequence starts with a black move. Further, Nb5 is not even a possibility in the position (attention! knight move is L-shaped, not diagonal). Of course you have posted some wrong FEN. It is hard for me to even have a discussion with someone so internally confused. So kindly paste a diagram/FEN of a position on which I have actually commented - not some fantasy, place below it your sequence of LEGAL moves (not skipping a white or black move, having the knight move diagonally, etc.), and then no doubt I will prove your analysis "worthy" again. OK? :) >at least > >if you call that dead drawn then sorry you dont know what you talk about. I don't call it "dead drawn" - I call it "Your position makes no sense and you have blundered again many times in your post." Best, A.S.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.