Author: A. Steen
Date: 15:05:56 11/22/05
Go up one level in this thread
On November 22, 2005 at 17:04:20, Günther Simon wrote: >On November 22, 2005 at 16:30:20, A. Steen wrote: > >>On November 22, 2005 at 16:11:30, Günther Simon wrote: >>>Less trolling would be better too, Mr. X. from Germany >> >> >>Excuse me? >> >>I have absolutely no idea of what you are speaking. >> >>Since you seem also to misunderstand I will make it even simpler. >> >>Some Ted Summers posted that his Fritz9 produced a certain result. >>My Fritz9 produces an apparently quite different result. >>I want to see what is the actual position, how many different F9 versions are >>distributed, and what they evaluate this position to be. >> >>Because of Mr Utzinger's confusion caused by him switching off his eyes after a >>few lines of the post, he seemed to think that the fact that CB is no doubt >>using a different version of F9 in Bilbao from any distributed version, that >>somehow invalidates my test. >>Of course this is nonsense, as Summers was not running the Bilbao version but a >>distributed version. >> >>Simple enough? If you are taking some medication, maybe a dose was missed, a >>fresh prescription needs to be sought, or ,,, ? > >Thanks for the next insult Mr Q odds... Your very first interaction with me was to refer to me as a troll and as Mr X from Germany - this without my having addressed you ever before AFAIK - and you have the sheer gall to write this "next insult"? >You insulted Enrico, Kurt, Michael and virtually every poster >who was in touch with you. Not intentionally. Because of the scroll-away nature of this board, and that the board's "Search" seems to work in a parallel universe, I don't know for sure who you refer to when you use first names like this. I am not part of your cosy club of shared genius (or mediocrity, you choose) so I am unfamiliar. Is Enrico the one who posted an example to show that EGTBs were necessary (which I agree with in general though certainly not in all cases), but his example position actually indicated the precise opposite (all 10 engines he quoted almost instantly found in that position the unique best (fastest to mate) move, and 9 did not waver even once?). I politely pointed out his example was actually a counter-example, and he immediately became aggressive, then when his brain encompassed his error, defensive, confused and very insulting and rude. Is Kurt the one who implied my post had little point, when in fact he had confused himself by only reading the first few lines of it? Surely one checks before criticising. His "Sorry" button does not seem to work either. Is Michael the one who claimed a super-GM's move was nonsense, also that his plan was a suicidal attack, when I (AND OTHER, SUBSEQUENT GRANDMASTER COMMENTARY) shows the GM's move was a brilliancy, and I showed that the alleged "suicidal" attack was in fact a sure-fire draw? Good examples you chose! Or was one of your three the kid who had hard drives with no latency or seek time, or alternatively perhaps RAM that managed to contain all relevant EGTBs without any upload time? The kid who finds my comment that >All you wrote so far in the CCC forum was either arrogant, insulting >or trolling, like this post is a nice example again. >What about more Queen odds? > >BTW you cannot verify hashtable bugs in a simple way. Most correct, a welcome change. The sky often looks blue. My girlfriends are beautiful. Water is "wet". And did you find some way to misunderstand- http://www.talkchess.com/forums/1/message.html?463703 where I had replied to a question with: " you cannot, replicate the contents of the actual playing machine's hash tables, which (unless flushed manually or by the program) are a result of earlier thinking, time controls, amount of ponder time and so on." ? >Spare all your false 'best' and 'dear', I do the same. Because you are impolite, that places no requirement upon me to emulate you. Your "Sorry" button seems as broken as those of many people here, but I am happy to say sorry if my exposures embarrassed you. Best, A.S.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.