Author: Thomas Logan
Date: 15:46:36 11/22/05
Go up one level in this thread
On November 22, 2005 at 10:03:53, Geo Disher wrote: >On November 22, 2005 at 08:08:47, Robert Hyatt wrote: > >>On November 22, 2005 at 06:27:51, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: >> >>>On November 22, 2005 at 06:25:35, Ted Summers wrote: >>> >>>>I read here on this forum that other users of Fritz 9 did not have this blunder. >>>>So I gave my copy of Fritz 9 a shot at the game to annotate. My Fritz 9 not only >>>>see's 39. ...Bc2 as a big mistake, but it states that Qxg3 was winning for >>>>black. >>>> >>>>Now I wonder if this blunder was not more hardware related. My home system is a >>>>PIV 3Ghz with 1.5 Gig of ram. Which is much strong than the laptop they used. Or >>>>was it a bug it the Fritz "Bilbao" version. >>> >>>A 2.0Ghz Centrino laptop runs much *faster* than a 3.0Ghz P4. >>> >>>-- >>>GCP >> >>This is just very deep. It would take some kind of hardware to get many >>programs to see this in reasonable time. One of "those positions"... > > >I think it may be a bug. My Fritz 9 never even showed Bc2 in the top 3 move >choices. Mine did It was top choise early on but was dropped out of the running 1791: Ponomariov - Fritz, II Man vs Machine, Bilbao 2005 6k1/5p2/pn1p4/N2p2p1/PP1Pp2q/1BrbP1QP/6K1/4R3 b - - 0 1 here it still is in the running Analysis by Fritz 9: 1. -+ (-2.22): 39...Bc2 40.Qxh4 2. -+ (-2.50): 39...Qxg3+ 40.Kxg3 f5 41.Kh2 Kf7 42.h4 gxh4 43.Kh3 Bc4 44.Bd1 f4 45.Kxh4 Rxe3 46.Rxe3 fxe3 47.Nxc4 dxc4 48.Kg3 Nd5 3. -+ (-2.47): 39...Nc4 40.Qxh4 gxh4 41.Bxc4 dxc4 42.b5 Rc2+ 43.Kh1 c3 44.b6 Kf8 45.b7 Rb2 46.Rc1 c2 47.Kg2 Rb1 48.d5 Ke8 49.Kf2 (, 22.11.2005)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.