Author: enrico carrisco
Date: 00:29:29 11/23/05
Go up one level in this thread
On November 22, 2005 at 17:16:15, A. Steen wrote: >On November 22, 2005 at 16:43:08, Oreopoulos Kostas wrote: > >>Dear A.Steen >> >>My Fide rating is 2285. > > >Amazingly high, given your analyses and reasoning. > >Have you visited Myanmar? > > >>What is yours? ( i did search for some steen at fide but no luck) > > >Much higher than yours. Since every really strong player who posts here gets >attacked, you won't get more than that, and all precautions have been taken >including the use of a relay IP. http://www.talkchess.com/forums/1/message.html?463265 Which is it, really? Whatever serves your purpose at the time of posting? -elc. > >[D]6rk/3b3q/npNp4/2pPp3/1PP1Ppr1/P1Q5/5RP1/4BRK1 w - - 0 34 > > >>I think you are really a very weak player. > > >Hahaha, this is from the "strong" player (you) who gave the most low-quality >analysis sequence: > >34. .. "Ne5 de5 Qe5 Qg7 Bc3" > >as evidence of white's superiority? Jaja! > >When your Q-g7 is a total and idiotic blunder, and further you even miss the >best (by far) refutation to it (Q-h5+, not the mediocre Bc3)? > >Of course you are embarrassed by your silly blunder, so you snip out all that. > > >>This position is totally open. > > >It is not open in the sense you use the term. It only looks open to weak >players. There are forcing continuations leading to perpetual check. > > >>But i guess that is how much you can understand. > > >From one such as you, I must take that as an honour badge. :) > > >>ofcourse ne5 leads to a draw, but that was to show you that a 15sec analysys >>can bring many ideas to a position. > > >So let us stop and understand your "logic"- > >I gave a position and said it was a dead draw. >[D]6rk/3b3q/npNp4/2pPp3/1PP1Ppr1/P1Q5/5RP1/4BRK1 w - - 0 34 > >You told me the position I gave was not, in fact white was better and as proof >you gave a sequence. > >Your sequence is proven to be a nonsense, of very poor quality. > >When corrected, it shows that it leads to a forced draw, > >You then admit "ofcourse [sic] ne5 leads to a draw" > >How many defeats must you receive?? > > > >>for example after >> >>[D] 6rk/3b2q1/npNp2rn/2pPp3/1PP1Ppp1/P1BQ3P/5RP1/3B1RK1 w - - >> >>white can play 28... Qh7 29. Nb5 hg4 30 Ng4 Ng4 32 Bg4 Bg4 33 hg4 Rh6 34 Qf3! += > > >Let us look at the quality of your analysis. :) > >You say "white can play 28... Qh7". > >Excuse me. > >That is BLACK playing. Not WHITE. > >Your FEN position & diagram show it is white to play, but your move sequence >starts with a black move. > >Further, Nb5 is not even a possibility in the position (attention! knight move >is L-shaped, not diagonal). > >Of course you have posted some wrong FEN. > >It is hard for me to even have a discussion with someone so internally confused. > > > >So kindly paste a diagram/FEN of a position on which I have actually commented - >not some fantasy, place below it your sequence of LEGAL moves (not skipping a >white or black move, having the knight move diagonally, etc.), and then no doubt >I will prove your analysis "worthy" again. OK? :) > > >>at least >> >>if you call that dead drawn then sorry you dont know what you talk about. > >I don't call it "dead drawn" - I call it "Your position makes no sense and you >have blundered again many times in your post." > > >Best, > >A.S.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.