Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: draw detection anomalies

Author: Charles Roberson

Date: 06:37:30 11/23/05

Go up one level in this thread



   I've experimented with both methods. My results for method 2 were identical
 to yours and were caused by an horizon effect. Simply put: the draw wasn't seen
because the second repeat was delayed beyond the horizon by a series of moves.
This is the same problem as not seeing a mate due to a long series of delaying
moves/sacrifices. Of course, various types of extensions reduce the
probabilities of mate delays being an issue but think of it without the
extensions.

     However, there is a third option which is used by some of the others. The
idea is to have a no progress penalty. So use method two, but when you see the
first rep assign a no progress penalty. This may help. I had a conversation with
Tony Werten (Xinix) about this, I believe he uses it.

   Charles



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.