Author: Otello Gnaramori
Date: 13:01:30 11/23/05
Go up one level in this thread
On November 23, 2005 at 15:54:14, Barry Culp wrote: >On November 23, 2005 at 15:35:51, Henrik Dinesen wrote: > >>On November 23, 2005 at 15:28:15, Sune Larsson wrote: >> >>>On November 23, 2005 at 15:20:11, Ovidio Santistevan wrote: >>> >>>>Looking at the results, as of today, the programs are clerly ahead in this >>>>tourn.: >>>>People 2.5 >>>>Programs 6.5 >>>>Now, if these strong GMs had spent some time analyzing Father's games against >>>>programs, the results might have been different: they could have learned how to >>>>play against machines... >>>>Just a thought. >>> >>> You mean like Ponomariov in today's round? Pono was clearly uninterested in >>>playing chess... >>> >>>/S >> >>Also, would it be possible, with general success, to use that strategy with >>normal TC, and still make the progs loose on time (in superior positions) ? >> >>Henrik > > >I think the anti-computer chess used by "Father" on playchess has several flaws. >It depends in large part on > >a) the comp program losing on time violation > > OR > >b) the comp program losing around move 256 due to a bug / limitation in the >Chessbase GUI > >When "Father" recently played Zappa in a 60min+15sec he lost all 3 games that I >saw. IMHO he has very little chance to win in long time formats. Draws are >possible if the postition becomes very blockaded. I found it amusing that >"Father" commented today on playchess speculating that Junior would lose its >game in 256 moves. I guess he assumed that the CB GUI bug was everywhere. Of >course if the players at Bilbao were using playchess then there wouldnt be any >need for a site relay would there Father ? > >LMAO This "Father" guy is legendary...I remember that in a previous post I was comparing him to Don Quixote against the Windmills. w.b.r. Otello
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.