Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Maybe Fritz 9 Blunder had to do with Hardware

Author: chandler yergin

Date: 02:34:14 11/24/05

Go up one level in this thread


On November 24, 2005 at 05:25:56, Otello Gnaramori wrote:

>On November 24, 2005 at 05:06:32, chandler yergin wrote:
>
>>You can see that on Move 44...Bc2 Black had a high PV at 14 Ply when it had to
>>move. Humans don't have that restriction. Humans can also see and plan for
>>Long Term Strategic weaknesses, far below the horizon for Computers.
>>Shredder gave the best line at 20 Ply
>>It's depth...  not hardware.
>
>It was already stated by several posters that very probably the F9 Bilbao has a
>bug in that position evaluation, since other versions doesn't make same
>problematic move.
They were and are wrong.

There is no Bug! As I stated it's the Depth of Search,, not hardware or bug.
Had Fritz searched to Ply 20, it would not have made the move.
When the time allocation software tells the Program to move..
it's gotta Boogie.  Humans don't have that Problem.


>This is the most logical conclusion in my p.o.v., ... about the horizon as
>stated also in a previous thread it is a "classic" refrain from chessbase when
>this accidents happen.
>
>w.b.r.
>Otello



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.