Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Father blunders

Author: Pablo Ignacio Restrepo

Date: 03:31:41 11/24/05

Go up one level in this thread


On November 24, 2005 at 06:22:27, Barry Culp wrote:

>Well Fathi Im surprised you didnt claim some sort of theoretical novelty
>
>In fact you blundered away a half point by allowing a 50 move rule draw. All you
>had to do was sac a pawn and hold our for a few more moves and then you could
>have claimed a win when you reached the beloved anti-chess 256 move barrier.
>
>Get with the program !
>
>LOL

Hello Barry ....

Barry I was thinking in that- your idea-  during the game  ,,,,,,, but this was
my first game when I was puting the Pet into the box  ...... and I was afraid
that the box had a little doard and the snike went out and put the poison  into
my right  hand  or my little lefth finger  .........
for that reson I did not do that ....... I have a question for you .....  Was
the snike in total k.o. in the move 256 too, like consecue ce of  the interface
of playchess items?

Thanks in advance,

Pablo



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.