Author: Andrew Dados
Date: 22:12:44 03/20/99
Go up one level in this thread
On March 21, 1999 at 00:34:48, Ed Schröder wrote: >>Posted by Paulo Soares on March 20, 1999 at 23:04:55: > >>Mark, >> >>In my opinion these games do not say what it goes to be of >>chesscomputer has ten years (see my born for Ed). I forgot >>to place in the Born for Ed that hashtable will be very bigger. >> >>Best regards, >> >>Paulo Soares, from Brazil. > >The hash table size in the CHESS 2010 experiment is indeed a very >unclear item. > >For the CHESS 2010 experiment I use 4 x Pentium-II 266, 64 Mb PC's >and 2 x Pentium-II 450, 128 Mb. > >My guess is that for some programs this is not enough for the 40/40:00 >time control. Heck, I can't even tell for my own program. > >The "2010" formula is more or less based on the fact that every year >(single) processors become faster with a factor of about 0.75. Memory >will also go up nobody knows with how much but it will have a positive >effect to the speed increase too. Add up the software improvements >and I do think the factor 20 I have chosen is not such a bad one. > >Summery, just guessing...... and for what it is worth....... > >- 11 years x 0.75 gives a Pentium at 4000 Mhz (8 times faster) hmm... isn't it rather (1.75)^10, which is about 270 times faster? [snip]
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.