Author: adam wilks
Date: 06:56:40 11/24/05
Go up one level in this thread
Hello, You claim to have not taken back any moves but 4...g5 was originally played by fruit but it was taken back for 4..d6 instead. This takeback move was extremely early in the game and i think it wouldnt be detremental to fruits reputation against humans as the rest of the game is determined by it. If a takeback move occured at around 30 or half way in an average length game then one can be suspicious of fruits play but as this is not the case i`m suspicious of the takeback 4..g5 which was replaced by 4..d6 instead. Personally i think 4...g5 is stronger than 4...d6 against anyone/thing as it will destroy the premature pawn attack especially at f4 and prepare the bishop for g7 and kingside castling allowing the rook on f8 too exploit this pawn advance on f4 reminiscent of Henry Bird and Boris Spassky later on in the game.
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.