Author: A. Steen
Date: 09:10:46 11/24/05
Go up one level in this thread
On November 24, 2005 at 10:57:09, K. Burcham wrote: >On November 24, 2005 at 09:40:32, Uri Blass wrote: >> >>It likes Bb5+ but later changes it's mind to Qd2 and I suspect that both moves >>are winning > >>(Blass, Tel-Aviv 24.11.2005) > >I suspect 15.Bb5, 15.Qd2, and 15.Qxd8 all are winning for white. Without question. You missed my annotation after move 7, stating that black was lost. After 7 more moves, no miracle has occurred. :) My objections to 15. Q-d2 are ones which any non-computer should understand. Why go there? What reason can there be for such a retreat? I do not need to read the computerised justifications, they _must_ be mistaken. No human player should consider it, or the Q exchange, when such excitement as the B-check affords is available. If instead we play like robots, we will become as stupid as the robots. :) Best, A.S.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.